Search for: "MOORE v. MOORE" Results 3121 - 3140 of 5,276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2012, 2:52 am
Kitchen LJ granted permission, and in the Court of Appeal sat the Master of the Rolls, and Lords Justice Lloyd and Moore-Bick on 21 May 2012 to hear Apple's appeal. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
What muddied the waters in this area was the Supreme Court's decision in Hartman v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
In Sulamérica Cia Nacional De Seguros S.A. v Enesa Engenharia S.A. [2012] EWCA Civ 638, the insurance contract in question concerned a project in Brazil, was governed by Brazilian law, and disputes arising out of or in connection with the policy were subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Brazilian courts. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:54 am
Second, he agrees with Moore-Bick LJ that the reasoning in C v D is not the foundation of the Court's decision here; in fact, he thinks a "powerful case" may be made against the reasoning in C v D. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:45 am
Lord Justice Moore-Bick stated he did not think that that the parties' "express choice of Brazilian law to govern the substantive contract is sufficient evidence of an implied choice of Brazilian law to govern the arbitration agreement". [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:37 pm by Peter Rost
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
24 May 2012, 2:44 pm by WSLL
Moore of Moore, Cockrell, Goicoechea & Axelberg, P.C., Kalispell, MontanaDate of Decision: May 23, 2012Facts: Christine Nodine (Mrs. [read post]