Search for: "Matter of M C B"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 3,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am
Beaver June 30, 2009), Judge C. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:00 pm
" The 112 count indictment unsealed in Cayuga County Supreme Court today charges 21 people with crimes including various Criminal Sale and Criminal Possession of a Controlled Substance (class A,B,C,D felonies) and Conspiracy in the second degree (class B felony). [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:43 pm
The amount of time involved is another matter. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
As it is a question of fact, ultimately this must be a matter for the court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
As it is a question of fact, ultimately this must be a matter for the court. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:26 am
In many, but not all cases there will be an express or implied choice of law agreement in favor of German law by way of reference to the German Standard Building Contract Terms "VOB/B" or, in case of a supplies contract, the "VOL/B" respectively. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 7:15 pm
Updated for two additional notes to the SEC at bottom of post To the Securities and Exchange Commission: Recently, Overstock.com (NASDAQ: OSTK) CEO Patrick M. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 11:23 am
… (c) 1. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:16 am
Charles M. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:32 pm
C. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:12 pm
B. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 3:30 pm
Who: The Honorable Sidney B. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memorandum by Charles Nathan of Latham & Watkins LLP, Rhonda Brauer of Georgeson and Raluca Papadima of Latham & Watkins LLP.) [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 10:13 pm
I'm thinking of the capital gains tax. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:43 am
 However, I’d still fall in the A or B answer category since I’m not insane and also because I know the law. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 11:51 pm
We argue by analogy (A like B, therefore A; no, A is like the rejected C, therefore not A.) because that's the proper framework for what we do. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 11:50 am
I'm not sure. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:40 am
Eugene M. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:14 pm
One puzzle that Section 36(b) introduces, of course, is just what fiduciary duty the Congress had in mind, given the traditional divvying up of fiduciary duty int [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stacy M. [read post]
