Search for: "No Named Defendant" Results 3121 - 3140 of 57,413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2023, 8:57 am by Eric Goldman
HK received a school suspension for “gross misbehavior for his posting a fake Instagram account impersonating a teacher (under an assumed name), posting to that account as the teacher, and sharing the username and password with other students. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:11 am by Eugene Volokh
It's a case about Defendants' alleged negligence in how it handles information. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 6:46 am by Searcy Law
An issue which can complicate the naming of all necessary defendants is the fact that trucking companies, as well as other relevant parties, may be part of a complex corporate structure. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 6:46 am by Searcy Law
An issue which can complicate the naming of all necessary defendants is the fact that trucking companies, as well as other relevant parties, may be part of a complex corporate structure. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 6:46 am by Searcy Law
An issue which can complicate the naming of all necessary defendants is the fact that trucking companies, as well as other relevant parties, may be part of a complex corporate structure. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 5:36 pm by Irina Manta
The dispute revolved around a squeaky, chewable dog toy made to look like a bottle of Jack Daniel's whiskey, but with the name "Bad Spaniels" rather than Jack Daniel's printed on it. [read post]
” Alabama Secretary of State Wes Allen—the named defendant in Thursday’s decision—stated he was “disappointed” in the court’s decision. [read post]
The Court reasoned that the lower court’s interpretation is too broad as it effectively includes anyone who uses a person’s name in tandem with a billing method in an ordinary case of overbilling. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Defendant argues that Plaintiff's three causes of action should be dismissed under California's anti-SLAPP statute because "(a) [they are] impermissibly predicated on Defendant Grimmway's exercise of its free speech rights (namely, political advocacy and statements of public interest), and (b) Plaintiff will fail to establish a probability of prevailing on the merits. [read post]
The Board also addressed a problem common to many custodial MSA agreements, namely the lack of sufficient provisions to deal with a future request for change of administrators. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by William McDonald
Because the ad used identifying characteristics unique to White, although it did not use her name or precise image, the court in that case held that Samsung’s use of the robot still violated White’s right-of-publicity. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:16 pm by Karen Gullo
” New Jersey detectives showed his image to two witnesses, who identified him as the robber.Despite the centrality of the match to the case, nothing was disclosed to the defense about the algorithm that generated it, not even the name of the software used. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 1:23 pm by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
This is very important because there’s a good chance that your OWN INSURER, will have to defend the claim. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 12:14 pm by Administrator
They often involve serious allegations of egregious state misconduct and always call for serious consequences, namely, a permanent halting of the prosecution (Babos, at paras. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 11:07 am by Eugene Volokh
" The three Plaintiffs communicated to Defendants that they did not have their permission to disclose their names in the documentary. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 10:46 am by Michael C. Dorf
The main point of the Lanham Act is not to encourage creative names for companies and products. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:34 am by Bill Marler
We in the U.S. tend to think about food safety from our perspective. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:24 am by Eugene Volokh
The plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating personal jurisdiction once the defendant moves for dismissal under Rule 12(b)(2). [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 7:13 am by Florian Mueller
Formally, they were not enjoined last year as they weren't named as defendants to the original infringement action, but now they are to the extent they offer OPPO and OnePlus products implementing the patent-in-suit. [read post]