Search for: "People v A. M." Results 3121 - 3140 of 14,344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2008, 7:29 pm
I previously posted about the case of Miken v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:09 pm by Michael Froomkin
Yesterday I attended the Coral Gables Forum candidates’ debate for Coral Gables Commission Group V election. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 10:14 am
Ogletree, Jr., All Deliberate Speed: Reflections on the First Half-Century of Brown v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:45 am
Those other people need to acknowledge that they don't know as much as they think, but the things not known surely don't include the things Clarence Thomas has been writing — notably in Grutter v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:02 am by Liisa Speaker
The first time, the court remanded for an evidentiary hearing under People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436 (1973). [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 11:09 am by Bill
") It would seem obvious that whether a record is kept on paper, or electronically is irrelevant to whether it is relevant or likely to lead to relevant information, but people still fight about it--  see, e.g., Gilbert v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This year, I'm returning to the subject, trying to analyze the strongest arguments for and against such statutes. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am by Jane Chong
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:44 pm
The newest salvo comes from Ohio, the land that gave us US v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
"As for the consumer argument that certain citizens depend on affordable smartphones to a greater extent than others, and that minority businesses on average have a disadvantage in terms of resources to fend off threats, the brief provides statistical facts that lend those claims significant credibility--even in my eyes, though I'm not easily persuaded by minority [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Moreover, over 50 years after the Supreme Court invalidated miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:07 am
  I'm in a stretch where blogging time is limited, and I will have more to say about this case and this transcript later, but as the audience for this blog includes a lot of really sharp people who like to read and interpret documents for themselves, I want to put this out in the public domain. [read post]