Search for: "People v High" Results 3121 - 3140 of 15,041
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm by Marty Lederman
  There's simply no reason at all to think that the 2017 Congress believed that anyone (no reasonable person, anyway) would purchase unwanted insurance because of a "sense of legal obligation" engendered by the 2017 statutory amendment.But even if there were some such unreasonable people out there (such as, perhaps, the individual plaintiffs in the case) who mistakenly read the amended Section 5000A to require them to purchase insurance, those… [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 7:04 am by Minick Law
And sometime this evening, or maybe a couple of days from now, we will have a lot of new people in office, maybe some of the same. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On Monday 2 November 2020 Nicol J will hand down judgment in the most high profile media law case of the year, Johnny Depp v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
I recall being enraptured by Griswold v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:38 am by Zahavah Levine, Thea Raymond-Sidel
Because turnout will be high this year, and so many voters will be using the mail-in option, many of them for the first time, the number of ballots rejected for signature mismatch and missing signatures will likely be higher. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:30 pm by Cleve Clinton
Not surprisingly, the CDC recommended avoiding high-risk activities, including traditional door-to-door trick-or-treating, trunk-or-treating, attending indoor costume parties, visiting indoor haunted houses, and going on hayrides or tractor rides with large groups of people. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am by Connor Clerkin, Lane Corrigan
Under the Constitution, according to Gorsuch, judges cannot “improvise with their own election rules in place of those the people’s representatives have adopted. [read post]