Search for: "People v. Block" Results 3121 - 3140 of 4,871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2014, 10:12 am by Tara Hofbauer
Circuit Court’s per curiam order in Allaithi v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:05 am
  |  The 17th draft of UPC Rules of Procedure.Never too late 18 [week ending Sunday 2 November] -- The Limerick Competition results | More on CJEU in BestWater | The GC in Laguiole | France to review its IP Code | Reports on the “no patents round-up for non-techie people” event | Renting an orphan work in the UK | Aldi and look-alikes | The UK Supreme Court in Servier v Apotex | Are patent trolls really a… [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
Never too late 16  [week ending Sunday 19 October] -- The Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Nampak Plastics Europe Ltd v Alpla UK Ltd | Former Eagle member claims infringement of his name in the US | The Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Specsavers v Asda | A change in format for the European Patent Attorney exam | Reflections over IP5 patent filing figures |  ‘Common Sense For Copyright’… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:10 am by Jani
As such Richemont wanted to halt the websites' operations, and approached the courts to impose an injunction to block the websites.What remains the bigger question in this case is whether such a block is possible under the current law, or as was framed by Justice Arnold: "First, does this Court have jurisdiction to make an order of the kind sought? [read post]
Unfortunately, less overt strategies have been implemented more recently to block African-Americans and other minorities from the ballot. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in Servier v Apotex. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:17 pm
In 2006, Defendant, together with the child moved to a different address on the same block, and, in July 2006, the defendant wrote a check for $800, to be used for rent. [read post]