Search for: "Peters v. Peters" Results 3121 - 3140 of 7,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: Giannicos v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
KG v Stokke A/S, Stokke Nederland BV, Peter Opsvik and Peter Opsvik A/S, a decision where the CJEU addressed the trade mark absolute grounds of “substantial value” and “shape which results from the nature of the goods themselves”. [read post]
16 May 2016, 6:30 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
If you need to discuss relocation, call the Law Offices of Peter Van Aulen for a free comprehensive in office consultation at 201-845-7400. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 6:34 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
The court ultimately granted Sunoco’s partial motions for summary judgment on the issues of invalidation due to a prior sale and the question of inequitable conduct.Super Lawyers named Illinois commercial law trial attorney Peter Lubin a Super Lawyer and Illinois business dispute attorney Patrick Austermuehle a Rising Star in the Categories of Class Action, Business Litigation, and Consumer Rights Litigation. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 8:51 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Super Lawyers named Illinois commercial law trial attorney Peter Lubin a Super Lawyer and Illinois business dispute attorney Patrick Austermuehle a Rising Star in the Categories of Class Action, Business Litigation, and Consumer Rights Litigation. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 5:37 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
You can view the full opinion here.Super Lawyers named Illinois commercial law trial attorney Peter Lubin a Super Lawyer and Illinois business dispute attorney Patrick Austermuehle a Rising Star in the Categories of Class Action, Business Litigation, and Consumer Rights Litigation. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
Jude Medical (IP Frontline) (PatLit) District Court N D California grants summary judgment of invalidity based on on-sale bar: PartsRiver, Inc v Shopzilla, Inc et al (EDTexweblog.com) District Court N D Illinois: Subjective colours require definition to avoid indefiniteness: On the First Ltd v Seiko Epson Corp (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Supreme Court asked to hear Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc – Should obviousness be determined by the court or… [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:03 am
” The case, Solid 21 Inc. v Hublot of America, et al. [read post]
11 May 2024, 7:42 am by Mavrick Law Firm
Peter Mavrick is a Miami business litigation attorney, and represents clients in Fort Lauderdale, Boca Raton, and Palm Beach. [read post]
19 May 2012, 6:00 am by An Hertogen
Steve Vladeck’s comments added to this by pointing to a series of recently decided or argued cases on contractor liability, included the lesser noticed United States v. [read post]