Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 14,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2016, 6:45 pm
“We agree with our sister circuits’ straightforward reading of Kay and see no reason, moreover, not to apply Kay’s generally applicable reasoning in the Title VII context,” the appeals court wrote. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 1:59 pm
” sneered the examining attorney. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
Attorney General, 290 F. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 11:17 am
" Sands v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:25 am
In so ruling the Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court’s holding that Education Law §2560, which incorporates by reference General Municipal Law §50-k, and Education Law §3028, are not in conflict and should be read together and "applied harmoniously and consistently," citing Alweis v Evans, 69 NY2d 199. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
In so ruling the Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court’s holding that Education Law §2560, which incorporates by reference General Municipal Law §50-k, and Education Law §3028, are not in conflict and should be read together and "applied harmoniously and consistently," citing Alweis v Evans, 69 NY2d 199. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 8:07 am
In Tingler v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 7:22 am
She teaches and writes about issues of constitutional law, and previously served as the Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, U.S. [read post]
6 May 2010, 10:22 am
Don't stop reading! [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:15 am
A recently published decision of Saseeshkumar v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 9:49 am
Days after I wrote about the Guardian Ad Litem (GAL) role for litigants here in the R.B. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 11:27 am
The plaintiff states in Louisiana v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 8:10 am
In People v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:43 pm
Second, I think Judge Perry made a rather large boo-boo… Third, read Sparkman v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:05 am
In City of Hesperia v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:05 am
In City of Hesperia v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:20 am
Read more to find out. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:34 am
In doing so, it provides the following analysis – it’s lengthy, but take a read: Having found that the Secretary’s arguments do not have persuasive value under Skidmore, the Court also observes that this case implicates the presumption announced in Brown v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
However, a federal court recognized in US v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 5:30 am
The recent cell phone case, Riley v. [read post]
