Search for: "SESSIONS v. STATE" Results 3121 - 3140 of 6,573
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2016, 5:23 am by INFORRM
Scarlet v Sabam decided in 2011 is limited to situations in which the data controller is the Internet Service Provider (ISP) itself. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 4:42 am by Edith Roberts
City of Miami and Bank of America Corp. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 7:18 am by Ronald Mann
The first week of the November session brings the justices once again to the False Claims Act, with Tuesday’s argument in State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Lee v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 9:15 am by Alex Loomis, Quinta Jurecic
Stay motion Judge Spath moves on to the defense’s “motion to abate pending the resolution of the United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:10 pm
The OEIGWG Chairperson-Rapporteur is then expected to ‘prepare elements for the draft legally binding instrument for substantive negotiations at the commencement of the third session’. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:53 am
A further report on the second case discussed at this seminar, R (Roche Registration Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health, will be posted on this blog in due course. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:45 am by Victoria Kwan
” Kennedy expressed disappointment at the current political climate in the United States, saying, “Half the world is looking at us. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 2:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
For judgment, please download: [2015] UKSC 56 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII To watch the hearing, please visit: Supreme Court website (25 July 2016 morning session and afternoon session), (26 July 2016 morning session)   [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am by Alex Loomis
Conceding that no cases were directly on point, Connell cites United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 11:30 am by Trish Butcher
 In order to stay in compliance with federal Antitrust laws (see NC State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]