Search for: "STATE v BUSH"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 4,538
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2009, 5:44 pm
By contrast, in People v Bush (2009 NY Slip Op 07066 [4th Dept 10/2/09]) the Court held thatContrary to the contention of defendant, his right of confrontation was not violated by the admission in evidence of a certified abstract of a registration record of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 4:19 pm
During the second Bush administration, hundreds of thousands of children eligible for subsidized health insurance were not enrolled because states failed to make enrollment convenient enough for time- and cash-strapped parents. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
Chambers v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
I’m delighted to say that the Nebraska Supreme Court has just agreed to review State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:33 am
Although the Supreme Court rejected the habeas-stripping provisions as unconstitutional in Boumediene v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:31 am
DRC, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
In Munaf v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:54 am
The Secret Service tends to investigate people for making comments about presidents even when the comment cannot rationally be described as a true threat. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Bush has no power to order the release of prisoners held by the Executive for seven years, when the Executive detention is indefinite and without authorization in law, and release into the continental United States is the only possible effective remedy. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 6:23 am
Bush to test the legality of Guantanamo Bay detentions, the most critical assessment of government evidence has just emerged, in Al Rabiah v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
United States, and American Needle v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:44 am
A case in point is Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 8:25 am
Bush and his legal counsel at the time, Alberto Gonzales infamously blew off during the 1990s. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
The case is called State of Connecticut v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:53 am
In Van Cleef & Arpels Logistics, S.A. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
Although the United States Supreme Court ruled in Baze v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 12:54 pm
Gerlich v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 12:00 am
Lumen Mulligan (Michigan State) has posted on SSRN his essay, Boumediene v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 1:45 am
Bush does apply to at least three prisoners at Bagram. [read post]
