Search for: "STATE v. HARRIES"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 5,753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2013, 10:07 am
AND H.B., No. 11-0024 - STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the equivalent state level agencies. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm
Carnes v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
For example, the Fifth Circuit in Stokes v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:53 pm
The recent Fifth Circuit opinion in Flagg v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:42 am
Likewise, the Court was not persuaded by Gunter’s argument that Cadle Co. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
Harris’ claims. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:25 pm
HARRIS, Appellant, v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 9:56 am
Harris, No. 14-15978 (9th Cir. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
In West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:55 am
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:23 am
(Bowen v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:34 am
That lawsuit became known as O’Donnell v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm
Boehner (R-Ohio ) in Washington on Oct. 27, 2015. ( Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg) In House of Representatives v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm
"[18] The Goslin court not only reversed the trial court, but it instructed the trial court to allow the petitioner to amend her petition since the record was absent of any representation regarding her residence at the time of filing.[19] Also on point is federal case law from within our State.[20] In Davis v Davis, 638 F Supp 862 (ND Ill 1986), the petitioner had not been a resident of Illinois for 90 days preceding the filing of her petition. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:16 am
They contended that the state court’s decision is inconsistent with Caldwell v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco: Michael M ____ v. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 3:28 pm
Instead it stated that "the present case involves a central issue of federal constitutional law, and although we abstain from ruling on issues of Texas constitutional law, see Railroad Commission v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 3:58 am
Trademark applicants in China have an additional “offensive” option not available in the United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 2:14 pm
Brown v. [read post]
