Search for: "Shields, in Re"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 4,400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2012, 9:49 am
In Re Marriage of Hill and Dittmer (1/18/12), B226017 While prenuptial agreements were once viewed with suspicion by trial courts, a recent decision reflects the current trend to uphold them particularly when the complaining party has competent legal representation and practical access to all relevant information concerning the other person's finances - whether they took advantage of that opportunity or not. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
If you’re looking for a somewhat more rational look at these bills before coming to an informed conclusion, read on. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:09 am
You’re in a situation where either taxpayers end up footing the bill, or injured parties do, which seems fundamentally unfair. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:46 am
[T]he district court erred by discounting or not recognizing each state's valid interest in shielding out-of-state businesses from what the state may consider to be excessive litigation. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana, 2011 Mont. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:11 am
If you’re using the standard Apple headphones, you won’t have any issues. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:20 pm
Image by Sean MacEntee via FlickrUnited States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Judge Liam O'Grady, in a three-page Memorandum and Opinion in In Re Application of the United States of America for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 2703(d) [Case No. 1:11-dm-00003-TCB], this week denied a request by Birgitta Jonsdottir, Jacob Appelbaum and Rop Gonggrijp to shield their Twitter account information from authorities seeking to prosecute WikiLeaks.As reported by… [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm
Code 1975 §12-21-142), or has limited it to certain types of media, (see In Re Contempt of Stone 397 NW 2d 244 [Mich Ct App 1986] where the then existing shield law applied to newspapers and periodicals but not newscasts), many courts and legislatures have recognised the difficulties of justifying limiting protection to traditional journalists. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 2:13 am
They're evil. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 8:29 am
Here is Shawcross fils quoting Shawcross pere, as the latter delivers his two-day closing argument to the Tribunal: “And so, after this ordeal to which mankind has been submitted, mankind itself –struggling now to re-establish in all the countries of the world the common simple things – liberty, love, understanding – comes to this Court and cries, ‘these are our laws – let them prevail. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 8:52 pm
., “whoever re-Tweets the most wins”). 3. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:23 am
You can also shield yourself from the cold weather inside the vehicle, too. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:06 am
Those of us who have been around for a while, and whose eyes (and nose) aren't shielded by self-interest and rationalization to justify why we've been wallowing in the gutter in the vain hope of making that nasty old phone ring, engage in a battle for survival. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
But while we want to shield officials from frivolous lawsuits, we also want to hold them accountable for truly bad behavior. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 5:27 pm
We're only two days into 2012, and it looks like this year will follow a very similar storyline. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 11:38 am
Maybe they’re even humorous most of the time. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 11:02 am
You're an attorney and, worse yet, a litigator. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
But if you do, yet still allow your editors to use inciteful over insightful language, then far from standing up for Britain, you’re a menace against all things that make it great“. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
” But ironically, Brenner argues, “[i]f you want to shield yourself against information theft or hide your own identity as you go about your business, it’s extremely difficult. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 2:08 pm
YouTube’s post-argument letter re Veoh is here. [read post]
