Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 3121 - 3140 of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2020, 4:21 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
As you may be aware, the VWP allows citizens or nationals of certain participating countries the ability to travel to the United States for a temporary period of 90 days or less without having to obtain a United States visa. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 8:29 am by Steven Cohen
Facts: This case (UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 10:46 am by Gene Takagi
Earlier this year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
United States, 556 U.S. 646, 647, 655–56 (2009); United States v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:36 am
Hill), United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California, Case No. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm by Elyssa Sternberg
The United States Supreme Court established a framework for evaluating discrimination claims based on circumstantial evidence in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
Sharp–(32 Cal. 2d 711)–Decided at the Supreme Court of California, this becomes the first case to find that anti-miscegenation laws in the United States were a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 10:48 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (DC Cir. 1923). [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:15 pm by Zachary Spilman
The end of Fosler continues apace, with a published en banc opinion from the NMCCA yesterday, in  United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
Schwarzenegger, the California same-sex marriage case, Gill v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:08 pm by Greg Mersol
Posted by Greg MersolAnother court has weighed in in favor of enforcing an arbitration agreement containing a class action waiver in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:19 am by Bruce Nye
United Shoe Mach. (1968)  392 U.S. 481, the Court of Appeal held that California law was different, and allowed for the pass-on defense. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 9:12 am by Carina Novell
At the time, this was considered a direct application of the United States Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 9:01 pm
In a closely watched case, the United States Supreme Court has refused the AARP's request for review of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in AARP v. [read post]