Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 3121 - 3140 of 8,247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2010, 11:47 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Cefetra BV, Cefetra Feed Service BV, Cefetra Futures BV and State of Argentina and Monsanto Technology LLC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:13 am by Lasse Søndergaard Christensen
Many people across the world are familiar with Obelix, a beloved character in the French comic book series ‘Asterix’, who fell into a cauldron of magic potion as a baby and as a result is in a permanent state of superhuman strength. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 1:18 pm
Indeed, Justice O'Connor's most quoted line in her 2004 plurality opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:28 am by Eugene Volokh
I don't have much to say about yesterday's Fifth Circuit decision in Defense Distributed v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 8:05 am by Lyle Denniston
Holder (10-545) — challenge to Congress’s power to restore copyrights that have expired (Justice Kagan is recused) Monday, Oct. 10 — legal holiday, no arguments Tuesday, Oct. 11: Pacific Operators Offshore v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:04 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Intellectual Property Holders of Pictoral Copyrights Denied Intervention In Google Infringement Action Pending Settlement The Authors Guild v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:47 am by Marissa Miller
” In an op-ed for the Denver Post, Tom Bie addresses the potential implications of PPL Montana for “anyone who likes fishing, rafting or canoeing public water in the United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:43 am by Andrew Koppelman
In his motion to dismiss in Pedersen v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 2:36 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit has ruled that New York City business owners can sue the president under the Emoluments Clause, the constitutional provision that says the president (and other federal office holders) cannot "accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or any foreign state. [read post]