Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2016, 6:21 am
The economy at large and society at large stand to lose from overcompensation of design patent holders. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 7:54 am
The decision to repeal s.52 was prompted by the outcome of Case C-169/08 Flos v Semeraro. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm
The case before the Court, Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:38 pm
Huawei v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
Paragraph 3 specifically states that “a licence holder or a person authorised by an exemption to generate, distribute, supply or participate in the transmission of electricity” must take these matters into account when requesting consent, parties who don’t hold a licence or exemption are not mentioned. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:17 am
The April 13, 2016, decision from the Second Circuit in Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 2:45 am
to holders of the exclusive right of reproduction". [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
Justice Breyer with opinion in Harris v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:41 pm
On Tuesday, April 26, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Mathis v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 7:36 am
Supreme Court argument has taken place in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 10:19 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 4:50 pm
The general rule in the United States is that either there is a carve-out for the committee bringing suit on behalf of the entity, or there potentially is no coverage. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
See Capitol Records, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
See Capitol Records, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:57 pm
Expressing frustration at two examples - Apple v Kodak and Broadcom v Qualcomm. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am
(emphasis added) Geist also complains that the objectives set out in the IP chapter of the TPP do not maintain “a balance between rights holders and users on all IP provisions”. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 7:33 am
Additional Resources: Johnson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
Clearly, law firms are significantly behind the curve, despite law enforcement agencies and cybersecurity firms issuing repeated warnings about the risks of attacks by insiders, fraudsters, hacktivists, unscrupulous competitors and nation-states. [read post]
