Search for: "State v. So "
Results 3121 - 3140
of 117,849
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm
And Troilus is more than interesting, it's fascinating: how any one dramatist could wring so many dimensions of anti-war sentiment out of a three-hours progress on the state is a kind of miracle in itself. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:18 pm
And Troilus is more than interesting, it's fascinating: how any one dramatist could wring so many dimensions of anti-war sentiment out of a three-hours progress on the state is a kind of miracle in itself. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
Introduction The Supreme Court heard argument last month in Moore v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 11:48 pm
And so the question becomes how to require that the states follow the applicable law. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:59 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:16 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:33 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 11:29 am
A member of the public wants to get bar passage data so he can study differential pass rates for various ethnic groups. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 3:46 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 2:12 am
R (Pereira) v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:47 am
Miller v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 2:19 pm
A deficiency for Reg. 8.2 means something lacking of sufficient importance to the fairness of the procedure, Hall v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 12:26 pm
State, 197 So. 791 (Fla. 1940) Hart v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 4:40 pm
The state wants a retrial on a strike, but there's no need to waste money doing so, since the net result (even if the state was successful on remand) would be to add a single day to the guy's already-existing 39 year sentence.Makes sense to me. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 5:02 am
The post JORDAN v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 9:40 am
By Jason Rantanen Nazomi Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:31 pm
JonesIn United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
One is this: if what prosecutors say is true -- and let us remember we have only heard one side of the story so far -- what went on with the Jones v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
However, whatever the source of the authority, “if an official has authority to speak for the State, he may have the authority to do so on social media. [read post]
