Search for: "State v. Vanness" Results 3121 - 3140 of 3,484
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2009, 12:53 pm
"  Op. at 8, citing Rothery Storage & Van CO. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 2:57 am
Van Ru Credit Corp., 109 F.3d 338, 346 (7th Cir.1997)(stating that “[t]he application of Rule 23 does not abridge, enlarge or modify any substantive right”); In re Baldwin-United Corp., 770 F.2d 328, 335 (2d Cir.1985)(stating that the federal class-action procedure set forth in Rule 23 “is a rule of procedure and creates no substantive rights or remedies enforceable in federal court”); Southwestern Refining Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 1:03 am
" In their private capacities, Van Dyke and MacKenzie are part of the team of lawyers representing the Office of Hawaiian Affairs in the State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
He died 3 days later of the injuries at the age of 47. * 1599: Nanda Bayin, a Burman king, reportedly laughed to death when informed, by a visiting Italian merchant, that “Venice was a free state without a king. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:56 am
Raulin v Minister van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen Case C-357/89 states that duration of work is a finding of fact, but also supports taking the previous wok history into account. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
" Vice Chancellor Donald Parsons, Jr.: "Delaware decisions like Caremark and Stone v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 1:36 pm
  I talked to the last Amish guy left in New Glarus (he was recovering from a motorcycle accident), the Rabbi from Lee v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 9:45 am by Roshonda Scipio
TITLE International governance and law : state regulation and non-state law / edited by Hanneke van Schooten and Johathan Verschuuren. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 7:28 pm
Van Arsdall 475 U.S. 673 the Court ruled that the error was not harmless, given the critical role of the complainant's testimony and the absence of other means to establish this bias.Similarly, in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:11 pm
But today is such a day, which reflects both the importance of today's lead story -- Staff Sergeant Martinez's acquittal -- and the doctrinal insignificance of the case CAAF released today, United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:40 am
The appellate court's decision reverses a judgment issued by a district court judge in the Central District of California of patent non-infringement entered in favor of ICU Medical Inc.The case in question is Medegen v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
StringerFeaturing Special Guests NY State Senator Tom Duane and NY State Assemblymember Daniel J. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 10:23 pm
Hoofddirectie van de Informatie Beheer Groep does give the member States some latitude to treat citizens of other member States differently from their own. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:32 pm
The Court held that"The threshold issue in evaluating whether a resentence is vindictive is whether the resentence is more severe than that originally imposed" (People v Cahill, 46 AD3d 1455, 1456; see generally People v Young, 94 NY2d 171, 176-177, rearg denied 94 NY2d 876; People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 159-160), and a determinate sentence of 25 years is of course more severe than one of 20 years. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:25 am
Ritter's letter suggests that the Court's 2005 decision in Van Orden v. [read post]