Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 40,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2022, 11:36 am
This would make Google a guarantor that advertisers never pay for a fraudulent click—in other words, for any undetected click fraud. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 12:16 pm
The court relied on Delaware law since, under the internal affairs doctrine, the issue was controlled by the law of the state of incorporation. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am
Parties’ submissions Firstly, Mr Robinson submitted that the line of authority beginning with Onibiyo [1996] EWCA Civ 1338 – which established that it was for the Secretary of State to decide whether further submissions constituted a fresh claim giving rise to a right of appeal – did not survive the Supreme Court’s decision in BA (Nigeria) [2009] UKSC 7. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 5:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 12:34 pm
In Murthy v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Bloomsbury International Ltd v Sea Fish Industry Authority and DEFRA [2011] UKSC 25 has its origins in a claim brought by importers unhappy with the imposition of a levy. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 6:43 am
Culhane v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:05 pm
Hernandez v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
Relying on its earlier Community word mark IMPULSE, leading brand owner Unilever NV opposed an application by Iron & Smith Kft. to register a colour figurative sign featuring the words ‘be impulsive’ as a Hungarian trade mark. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 2:35 am
In light of the issues presented by United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 11:49 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:13 am
Grisolia v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 8:47 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 5:48 am
The case is Coleman v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 4:21 pm
(Will Baude) A Tennessee prosecutor in the case of State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 2:39 am
Both observed that DOMA is constitutionally infirm to the extent that it reflects a bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group, an interest deemed impermissible in Romer v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:09 am
”) Smith v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 5:10 am
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 4:22 pm
Patent attorney Jill Browning attended today’s Tafas v. [read post]
