Search for: "Styles v. State" Results 3121 - 3140 of 5,642
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2014, 5:56 am
  * Retail omerta: Wilko v Buyology David pens a note on last week's High Court of Justice, England and Wales, decision in Wilko Retail Ltd v Buyology Ltd. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 3:31 pm
  The Argentinians will almost certainly try to spoil the German flow, and Ghana and the United States have proven that the Germans can be held or hobbled. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 11:39 am
“We don't think anything can be inferred about the state of the panel's deliberations and we look forward to providing the court with whatever assistance it requires to reach a decision. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm by Giles Peaker
If I am entirely honest, I find the style of Jackson LJ’s judgment rather unhelpful. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm by Jani
In the end the final word was the Supreme Court's.For the uninitiated, the American Broadcasting Companies Inc v Aereo Inc case dealt with the web-based service Aereo, which offered, for a subscription fee, the streaming, recording and live watching of TV programming. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:42 pm
The Supreme Court continued its trend of significant decisions today, issuing rulings in favor of copyright holders over technological innovation (ABC v Aereo) and in favor of upholding privacy rights in the face of police searches (Riley v California). [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:39 am by Kirk Jenkins
Four years later, the United States Supreme Court issued AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
The GC found to be equally irrelevant the circumstance that K-Swiss managed to have the five stripes registered as trade mark in eight Member States. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am by pscamp01
 The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am by pscamp01
 The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:14 am by Joy Waltemath
” The court affirmed, however, the lower court’s denial of the Association’s petition to set aside the dismissal on the ground that it was invalid because the court had never approved the settlement as required by Rule 23(e) (White v National Football League, June 20, 2014, Wollman, R). [read post]