Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2013, 5:52 am
Juárez v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 10:00 am
One of the most well-known examples occurred in Roe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 8:40 am
In Dastar v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:53 pm
Quite expectedly, Apple's brief follows up on that invitation. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:34 pm
Clean case, who told you to go Mc things up for yourself? [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:09 am
The trial court rejected the claims for fraud, violation of the consumer protection law, etc. on the pleadings, and the court of appeals affirmed. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 9:27 pm
TweetOver the next week or so I’ll hopefully be catching up on a few things that I haven’t been able to get to from the last several weeks, the first being the new Nasdaq and NYSE compensation committee listing standards: By way of background, Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act amended the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by adding new Section 10C which requires that the Securities and Exchange Commission adopt… [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 11:52 am
Indeed, consumer protection statutes are designed to protect consumers rather than to regulate corporate conduct.Celexa/Lexapro, slip op. at 5-6 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 2:45 pm
So saying this statute doesn't apply to these limited transactions hardly opens up a huge privacy hole. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:54 am
So, I looked it up. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:23 am
People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:35 am
Hall v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:30 pm
This ruling is important because it may invalidate all Board decisions in the last year and also because the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Richard Cordray are subject to a similar lawsuit in State Nat. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 8:48 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
On March 4, 2009, in its 6-3 decision, Wyeth v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:56 am
The intent of any kind of licensing scheme should be to protect the consumer. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Sprigman: Came up in Apple v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
(Compare Constantine V. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:19 am
Compare Pierson v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In Frisby v. [read post]
