Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 11,366
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2019, 8:44 am
The California State Bar is considering using artificial intelligence, too. [read post]
18 May 2019, 4:08 pm
An unpublished opinion of the California State Bar Court Review Department This matter concerns Sanjay Bhardwaj’s egregious misconduct stemming from his divorce from Anupama Pathak (Pathak). [read post]
17 May 2019, 4:58 am
In 2013, the American Bar Association approved a resolution calling on all state legislatures to prohibit the practice. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:05 pm
Holden of Oklahoma State University discussed the regulation of sports betting following the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:36 am
In the United States neither the deceased nor their estates can sue for defamation. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:04 am
Squire Patton Boggs litigators – including lawyers who have served as US Supreme Court clerks, California’s deputy solicitor general and high-ranking federal officials – have recently notched major victories at the US Supreme Court and several US Courts of Appeals, state supreme courts and regulatory agencies. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:25 am
For instance, the state’s wage statute as well as the federal Fair Labor Standards Act both contain provisions that bar retaliation against workers who file claims under those laws. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm
First, it held that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal court suits against states even in so-called federal question cases. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:35 pm
The high court has also held that the statute of limitations might time-bar some of these older cases, but only the class action litigation, not the individual claims, some of which were filed more than 15 years ago. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:15 am
Supreme Court Has Repeatedly Affirmed The Authority of the States On This Issue For More Than 100 Years. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:51 pm
But note that none of this addresses whether another state, like Nevada, can abrogate California's immunity in its courts, just as it might abrogate any other rule of common law. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:00 am
In 2015, the state’s Supreme Court ruled such ordinances were generally unconstitutional because they were too restrictive. [read post]
12 May 2019, 11:00 am
The second interesting thing about the Endo lawsuit is that it was filed in Pennsylvania state court (where Endo has it principal place of business), and not in either California or New York state court. [read post]
12 May 2019, 11:00 am
The second interesting thing about the Endo lawsuit is that it was filed in Pennsylvania state court (where Endo has its principal place of business), and not in either California or New York state court. [read post]
12 May 2019, 3:15 am
Bernier, 201… https://t.co/r3bi0ZMh8M 2019-05-06 B.C. designer claims Kardashian-backed company copied her brand https://t.co/gESfjRHBMl 2019-05-07 California Supreme Court Says FilmOn Libel Suit Can Proceed https://t.co/Wyc4xmpL5S 2019-05-07 The RIAA Battles to Keep Its Lawsuit Against https://t.co/PPQKEJZzq2 Out of Russia https://t.co/4PmXzgCsDq 2019-05-07 U.S. [read post]
11 May 2019, 8:42 am
An attorney who had litigated a civil matter for more than a year after learning of his client's death has been suspended for 30 days based on a recommendation of the California State Bar Court Hearing Department. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:38 am
Must possess a JD and be licensed in good standing by a state bar or have a limited license with expectation of receiving a JD and bar license within 6 months. [read post]
9 May 2019, 9:48 am
Misleh's actions are an apparent violation of Rule 5-200(D) of the California Bar' Rules of Professional Conduct. [read post]
9 May 2019, 6:20 am
Because the Ninth Circuit held that the agreement was ambiguous, the appellate court turned to California’s contra proferentem rule and held that this state law contract principle required the court to interpret the ambiguous language against the drafter—here, Lamps Plus. [read post]
