Search for: "Thomas Read" Results 3121 - 3140 of 15,920
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2021, 1:34 pm by mferzige
A Conversation with the Moot Court Finals Judges mferzige Wed, 05/05/2021 - 15:34 Read more about A Conversation with the Moot Court Finals Judges COVID-19 The judiciary Justice Thomas Balmer, '77, Judge James Ho, '99, and Judge Ann Marie Donnelly The American Constitution Society and the Federalist Society [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:00 am by Legal Talk Network
Pechman and Judge Thomas Samuel Zilly from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. [read post]
4 May 2021, 4:23 pm by Sandy Levinson
  I've not yet read all of the articles, but the three I've read so far are absolutely terrific, in every way. [read post]
4 May 2021, 4:30 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: Justice Clarence Thomas, Long Silent, Has Turned Talkative (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) Supreme Court declines to revisit precedent that restricts lawsuits from service members (Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Justice Clarence Thomas says ex-West Point cadet should be able to sue over alleged rape (Pete Williams, NBC News) Supreme Court justice castigates Feres Doctrine over cadet’s rape lawsuit (Meghann Myers,… [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:03 am by Ekow Yankah
This reading is sufficiently odd that the four bipartisan senators largely responsible for drafting the bill filed an amicus brief explaining that Congress intended to extend relief to low-level offenders. [read post]
3 May 2021, 7:27 am by Dennis Crouch
However, Thomas Lewry and his team at Brooks Kushman recently took-up the case and have petitioned for Supreme Court review. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:17 am by Marcia Coyle
There are not many “tea leaves” to read at this point in the term, which is somewhat unusual. [read post]
3 May 2021, 3:47 am by Rui Dias
  The programme reads as follows:   14:00-14:10 – Welcome and acknowledgments | Daniel Girsberger 14:10-14:35 – Overview of the process | Daniel Girsberger and Marta Pertegás 14:35-15:00 – General Comparative Report, with a focus on Art. 3 | Thomas Kadner Graziano 15:00-15:10 – Further general matters | Jan L Neels 15:10-15:15 – Publisher’s address | Andrew Dickinson 15:15-15:20 – Regional perspective: Africa | Jan L Neels… [read post]
3 May 2021, 2:16 am by Lisa L. Mueller (Casimir Jones S.C.)
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2021 Edition by Laurence Lai, Derk Visser, Peter de Lange, Kaisa Suominen€ 105 Handbook of Blockchain Law: A Guide to Understanding and Resolving the Legal Challenges of Blockchain Technology by Matthias Artzt, Thomas Richter€ 181 … [read post]
2 May 2021, 12:58 pm by Jayesh Rathod
Kavanaugh’s dissent seeks to poke holes in the majority’s reading of the statute and its legislative history. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 11:55 am by Emily Hammond
For example, Justice Clarence Thomas pushed Keisler to explain why “extension” shouldn’t be given its “more normal” reading; Justice Elena Kagan also emphasized this question. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 11:17 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
The author of this blog wasn’t able to read and analyse every brief in detail, but below you’ll find a series of quotes from them. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 11:17 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
The author of this blog wasn’t able to read and analyse every brief in detail, but below you’ll find a series of quotes from them. [read post]
Smith, the Court has read that Clause not to require accommodation of religious activity via exemptions from religion-neutral and generally applicable laws and regulations, but it does mandate that government not target ordiscriminate against religion. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 11:07 am by Josh Blackman
If one reading makes it harder for the government to harm people, and the other reading makes it easier for the government to harm people, then the former reading should be preferred. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 8:02 am by Jonathan H. Adler
S. 526, 534 (2004) (internal quotation marks omitted), not defer to some  conflicting reading the government might advance. . . . [read post]