Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 9,111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
The grant of privilege was not discretionary (Three Rivers District Council and Others v The Governor and Company of the Bank of England [2004] UKHL 48), and confidentiality in itself was not sufficient to render a communication privileged. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 12:04 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm
” The US Supreme Court in Golan v Holder has recognised that “some restriction on expression is the inherent and intended effect of every grant of copyright. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
Lee, No. 16-446 (Eligibility of new use of old manufacture – blackjack game) Post Grant Admin: Automated Creel Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:43 am
His income never returned to the level he earned prior to the conviction. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:43 am
His income never returned to the level he earned prior to the conviction. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
’” McMahon v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:27 pm
In Nartron Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:00 am
See Kim-Chee LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:00 am
See Kim-Chee LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:51 pm
In that connection, the Law lays down a number of criteria to be taken into account: (a) the harm actually caused to the holders of the intellectual property rights as a result of the reproductions classified as private copying; (b) the degree to which the equipment, devices and media are used for the purpose of such private copying; (c) the storage capacity of the equipment, devices and media used for private copying; (d) the quality of the reproductions; (e) the availability,… [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 9:42 pm
In 2001, Legacy proposed a 270,500–square–foot building for office, restaurant, and bank use, along with the City library and YMCA, with an underground parking garage structure. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:57 pm
It was alleged that, pursuant to an Option Deed between the parties, Apple & Pear Australia Ltd (APAL) had acquired the rights to a particular Chilean PINK LADY mark and had then, as required by the deed, granted Pink Lady America LLC (PLA) a license to use that mark. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:57 pm
It was alleged that, pursuant to an Option Deed between the parties, Apple & Pear Australia Ltd (APAL) had acquired the rights to a particular Chilean PINK LADY mark and had then, as required by the deed, granted Pink Lady America LLC (PLA) a license to use that mark. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
The defendant's motion to dismiss for facial insufficiency therefore is granted. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:38 am
The Act before us does something quite different. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 3:24 pm
& Assocs. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:29 pm
She has been in the US ever since. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 4:57 am
Second, the referring court would like to know whether the level of attention of the informed user is higher when comparing an RCD registered under Art. 8(3) CDR. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 1:43 pm
This case is but one of many where a procedure used to discipline or the level of discipline imposed created triable issues on whether the employer’s reasons were pretext for discrimination or retaliation. [read post]
