Search for: "United States v. Breyer"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 3,531
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2007, 7:51 am
As United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:24 am
United States (1992), which established the rule that the Tenth Amendment bars federal "commandeering" of state governments. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:02 am
Supreme Court heard arguments on Wednesday in the case of Samantar v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:31 pm
However, with the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:40 pm
In the case, City of Ontario v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 11:55 am
Patents in the United States have a term of 20 years from the earliest priority date. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
Hopwood notes that Paul Clement’s use of the phrase “unprecedented and unbounded” in his brief for the ACA challengers echoes a phrase used by the Chief Justice in the Court’s opinion in United Haulers Association, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
United States does not deal with sex offenders, its impact will surely be felt in the sex-offender cases. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:07 am
At no time was the United States Government or any federal official a party to any action.The particular proceeding that came to the Supreme Court as Medellin v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 12:58 pm
Petitioner Agusto Niz-Chavez had received precisely that kind of two-part notice before he had accrued 10 years of physical presence in the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:54 pm
Breyer has the opinion in PDR Network LLC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
On February 7, the Supreme Court of Hawai'i decided State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 6:10 pm
" As the City noted in its brief, "[h]istorically black colleges do not discriminate, for instance, by establishing programs to 'disproportionately appeal to' black students, provided they are 'open to all on a race-neutral basis' (quoting United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
“Although the United States agrees with [Davis] that the question presented is an important and recurring one on which there is a conflict among the courts of appeals and state supreme courts, this case is not a good vehicle to resolve that question,” the Department argued. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:43 am
" NAACP v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Department of Justice and was an assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:30 pm
The United States Supreme Court just finished hearing arguments in what will likely be a landmark case about the viability of the nation’s civil rights laws. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 7:31 pm
But at least in the United States, our rights are not so much stolen from us as they are simply lost by us. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 11:51 am
Start with the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:18 am
However, the decision applies only to a category of ostensibly public workers who aren’t “full-fledged” state employees, and to which the High Court’s 1977 holding in Abood v. [read post]
