Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 3121 - 3140 of 14,190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
§ 541, which provides in blanket terms that “[e]ach United States attorney is subject to removal by the President. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 7:30 am by Ilya Somin
As bad as the Kelo experience was for the victims, it did bolster the cause of property rights in the United States, and to some extent, even around the world. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 3:16 pm by Josh Blackman
Basing the Secretary's ability to completely overhaul immigration law on these general grants of authority would eviscerate that deliberate statutory scheme by "allow[ing the Secretary of DHS] to grant lawful presence … to any illegal alien in the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 7:45 am by Howard Friedman
The complaint (full text) in Association of Jewish Camp Operators v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:26 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Kopf Senior United State District Judge (Nebraska) [i]  Should we rename Ft. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:39 am by Mansell Law
On June 15, 2020, the United States Supreme Court published its decision in Bostock v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
On the role of bigotry claims in Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:27 pm by Jane S. Schacter
Kennedy wrote Romer v Evans (striking down a ballot measure broadly banning gay civil rights protections); Lawrence v Texas (striking down a criminal ban on consensual sodomy); United States v Windsor (striking down the federal Defense of Marriage Act); and Obergefell v Hodges (striking down bans on same sex marriage). [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 9:26 am by John Jascob
However, because the Commission has acknowledged that fiduciary duties may arise and state laws vary, customers could benefit from a uniform standard of conduct, said Berkovitz (Emily v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Yuanyou (Sunny) Yang
Several trade associations gave feedback, and raised five major concerns: The broad scope of the rule; The inability of many contractors to meet the August 2020 compliance deadline; (3) Whether the rule will apply outside the United States; Whether the term “use” would include a reseller’s commercial sales of prohibited products, thus preclu [read post]