Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 3121 - 3140 of 7,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2016, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:14 pm by Jason Rantanen
Samsung, stating: “We are bound by what the statute says, irrespective of policy arguments that may be against it”[xiii]. [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:48 am by Mark Hartsoe
The Federal District Court’s Decision Following a hearing, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga denied the defendant’s motion. [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:48 am by Mark Hartsoe
The Federal District Court’s Decision Following a hearing, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga denied the defendant’s motion. [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:48 am by Mark Hartsoe
The Federal District Court’s Decision Following a hearing, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga denied the defendant’s motion. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It states that “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be…subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial ass [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:42 pm by A. Brian Albritton
" Here, the Court essentially found that the false certification regarding minor breaches of the contract was not material to the government's decision to continue paying on the contract because the government continued to pay defendant on the contract long after the government knew of and defendant self-reported the violations.Defendant Black and Veatch was a large construction firm that contracted with the United States Agency for International Development… [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:42 pm by A. Brian Albritton
" Here, the Court essentially found that the false certification regarding minor breaches of the contract was not material to the government's decision to continue paying on the contract because the government continued to pay defendant on the contract long after the government knew of and defendant self-reported the violations.Defendant Black and Veatch was a large construction firm that contracted with the United States Agency for International Development… [read post]
2 May 2016, 12:48 pm by Peter Margulies
The crew stated that the MSF facility hadn’t been touched, reporting that the only structures affected were the “T-shaped building” or adjacent structures, which the GFC had earlier mistakenly identified as the NDS prison, although in reality the crew was still describing the MSF hospital. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:00 am by Gail Lamarche
The Court held that the statutory limitations on Workers’ Compensation attorney’s fees created by the Florida Legislature violated the Due Process clause of both the Florida and United States Constitutions. [read post]