Search for: "United States v. Younge"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 3,946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2011, 12:14 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:26 pm
In comments to the SEC, large global audit networks, including the Big Four, said that a new extraterritorial private action for cross-border securities fraud in connection with purchases and sales of securities outside the United States should not be created. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 3:18 pm
This standard comes from the United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of 1951, Article I, which the United States adopted with some modifications in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(42)(a). [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
The supreme court of Great Britain is televised, as is the supreme court of Canada, the state supreme courts, the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:13 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:10 am
Our laws relating to financial failure are so draconian that a failure when young can prevent you ever being able to raise funds in the future and even if you manage to start up again and be successful, whenever you are mentioned in the media no matter how successful you are even decades later you will be referred to as "Bill Smith the former bankrupt" In the United States failure is regarded as a part of the learning curve unless you have intentionally defrauded… [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 7:37 am
On Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Stok & Associates PA v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:29 pm
United States, 208 F.3d 41, 44 (2d Cir.2000) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Boria v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:46 am
In the case Martzloff v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a pro-German movement within… [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:45 pm
The long-running case of United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:12 pm
He showed that Johnson and Johnson warned of these risks in foreign countries, but not here in the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:05 am
See State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 12:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:44 am
In this case, the Second Circuit upholds the preclusion of evidence (an illegal gun) because the search violated the Fourth Amendment.The case is United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
”[6] MPEP § 707.07(f) incorrectly states that an examiner “should” answer all material traversed; it’s a statutory “must. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 12:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:08 pm
In Katzenbach v. [read post]
