Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 3121 - 3140
of 6,763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2016, 2:01 pm
In the recent case of League of Women Voters of Fla. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 5:40 am
The style of the case is, State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
The 5-3 opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 5:15 am
That you lack the support to do so suggests that you do not have sufficient public support, but that means you need to sell your beliefs to the voters. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 3:15 pm
Laws like this that restrict a woman’s ability to make her own decision aren’t just unpopular with voters, but as today’s decision makes abundantly clear, they are also unconstitutional. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm
Australia’s Offshore Processing Regime (Refugee Council of Australia, June 2016) [text]"Election 2016: 10 Things Vote Compass Reveals about Voters' Views on Immigration," ABC, 8 June 2016 [text]The Migration-security Nexus in Asia and Australia (Lowy Interpreter, June 2016) [part 1] [part 2] [part 3]- First three entries in five-part blog series. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:47 am
Osborn and Visa v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 5:35 pm
In Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm
Valeo, permits it to condition a charity's publication of a nonpartisan voter education guide, which lists all candidates equally and makes no endorsements, upon the immediate and public disclosures of the names and addresses of individuals making unrelated donations over the previous four years. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 12:25 pm
For example, in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s flawed decision in Kelo v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
Jennings v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:15 am
These voter restrictions are the result of the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 12:51 pm
Stephen Dinan of the Washington Times reports that this issue stems a 2001 court decision in Zadvydas v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
Peters v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am
Peters v. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 5:42 pm
Covault v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:10 pm
The application of Prop. 47 in some of these cases just doesn't seem to me like it was necessarily how the voters intended.That happens sometimes with statutes as well, of course. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 4:25 am
Additional Resources: Syracuse man uses 2 Social Security numbers to defraud government out of $87,000, June 8, 2016, Syracuse.Com, By John O’Brien More Blog Entries: Allensworth v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 3:21 am
Other coverage of the Court’s decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:41 am
Of Tex v. [read post]
