Search for: "ALL POTENTIAL CLAIMANTS" Results 3141 - 3160 of 4,877
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2013, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
  Repaired rotator cuffs and ACLs always have the potential to re-tear. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:24 am by Thompson & Knight LLP
  Facing potentially-large verdicts from Claimants and similarly-situated plaintiffs, Dow retained Kenneth Feinberg & Associates (“Feinberg”) with an eye to negotiating a “mini-global” settlement with all opt-out plaintiffs. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:18 am by Jamie Potter
The only potentially relevant condition that would permit disclosure was that in schedule 2, paragraph 6. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 6:23 pm by Jon Gelman
Bates said Garlock’s proposal to fund the trust with $270 million would be sufficient to satisfy all of the future and... [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 12:28 pm by Spencer Aronfeld
One reason is that before a lawsuit can be filed against the government, claimants must comply with a pre-suit notification process. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:06 am by Laurel Anderson
However, be aware that all of the content on your walls, including photos and instant messaging, could be potentially discoverable by your employer or opposing counsel in a litigated case if the content is relevant to your claim for benefits. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:46 am by David DePaolo
And what happens if lien fees are deemed unconstitutional, thus drying up a source of income to the Workers' Compensation Revolving Fund, but potentially creating a deficit if those fees are ordered reimbursed to the lien claimants (of course with interest)? [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:02 am by Kit Case
  Simply put, in Wisconsin, at least for the present, claimant information is confidential and not open to the public, other than to the parties to a current claim. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 7:50 pm by Adam Levitin
  I say "potential" because the Rooker-Feldman doctrine is quite narrow, and I just don't know all of the facts necessary to determine if it would apply. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 7:59 am by Daniel Richardson
  Indeed, the Court has arguably legislated here, simply by characterizing what this claimant sought as a “potential windfall” and by invoking a 2008 finding by the Legislature that “the comparatively high cost of workers’ compensation insurance in Vermont remains an issue of great concern to many Vermont employers. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 8:03 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Given all this, how could it be that in excess of $90 million dollars’ worth of legal work was done on behalf of the class? [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 6:03 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Given all this, how could it be that in excess of $90 million dollars’ worth of legal work was done on behalf of the class? [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 6:03 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Given all this, how could it be that in excess of $90 million dollars’ worth of legal work was done on behalf of the class? [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 11:26 am by Nancy B.
  Some insurers argue that, until after trial, it is impossible to determine its proper share of the defense, and therefore cannot make any payments until the liability is determined as to all of the potentially contributing policies. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm by Law Lady
Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division.Civil rights -- Attorney's fees -- Prevailing party -- District court abused discretion by awarding prevailing party attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. section 1988 to plaintiff who was awarded $1.00 in nominal damages for violation of her Fourth Amendment right to be free from illegal seizure, given the de minimis nature of plaintiff's victory -- Plaintiff's victory is not substantial enough to justify award of attorney's fees, given… [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 12:35 pm by Jon Gelman
All of these employees will receive benefits provided by this Act. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 7:34 am by Laura H. Juillet
  The fee structure will come into force for all claims commenced on or after 29 July 2013. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 8:10 am by Michelle Yeary
  [T]he term "mass action" shall not include any civil action in which ... all of the claims in the action are asserted on behalf of the general public (and not on behalf of individual claimants or members of a purported class) pursuant to a State statute specifically authorizing such action. [read post]