Search for: "Antonin Scalia" Results 3141 - 3160 of 6,601
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2015, 7:31 am by Mark Walsh
The most unexpected turn, however, comes from Justice Antonin Scalia and his comments on race. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:29 am by Amy Howe
Other coverage comes from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, Michael Lindeberger for The Dallas Morning News, and Greg Stohr for Bloomberg Politics (with another story focusing on Justice Antonin Scalia’s comments). [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 6:35 am by David Markus
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia suggested that black students benefit from a “slower track” at less prestigious schools and are thus harmed by affirmative action. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 3:13 am by SHG
Justice Antonin Scalia proposed that rather than place unprepared black students in a top state school “where they do not do well,” they should be sent “to a less-advanced school, a slower-track school where they do well. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 7:42 pm
"No, Scalia's comment about 'less-advanced' schools wasn't racist": Online at The Los Angeles Times, Michael McGough has an essay that begins, "Wednesday's oral argument in the Supreme Court over affirmative action at the University of Texas had barely concluded before the Internet lit up with 'shock horror' reactions to something Justice Antonin Scalia said. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:55 pm
" According to King's blog post, "'Hyperbole and insults can be great fun, particularly when they emanate from Justice Scalia,' Neuberger says in relation to off-the-wall American Supreme Court judge Antonin Scalia, who has been likened to law student favourite Lord Denning. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 3:00 pm by Elie Mystal
Scalia evidently doesn't even know the most famous astronomer in the country. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm by Ed Gehres
The questions of Justices Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito, and, to a lesser extent, Chief Justice John Roberts reflected skepticism of both the abilities of tribal courts and the constitutionality of allowing non-Indians to be subjected to civil jurisdiction for torts in tribal courts. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:41 pm by Amy Howe
  And Justice Antonin Scalia referred back to a case from last Term, in which the Court upheld the Arizona commission’s authority to draw federal congressional districts. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:14 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
And Justice Antonin Scalia found himself able to say only “Wow” about some implications of the government’s argument. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:04 am
Supreme Court in an argued case: Justice Antonin Scalia delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in Shapiro v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:15 am by Mark Walsh
Breyer and Antonin Scalia engaged in a  skirmish over one of their favorite topics: using committee reports and other legislative history to help interpret a statute (Breyer) versus relying strictly on the text of a law (Scalia). [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:55 am by SHG
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a dissent to the denial of cert, joined by Nino Scalia. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:01 am by Amy Howe
  Perhaps most notably, it denied review (over a dissent by Justice Clarence Thomas that was joined by Justice Antonin Scalia) in a challenge to an Illinois city’s ban on assault weapons. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:02 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Indeed, it is not unthinkable that Antonin Scalia believes that "sovereign states" within the US have such a right, as the US Supreme Court suggested in the 1837 case Mayor of New York v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined in dissent by Justice Antonin Scalia, argued that the U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:35 am
Justice Clarence Thomas issued a dissent, in which Justice Antonin Scalia joined, from the denial of certiorari in Friedman v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 11:40 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Hodges, el juez del Supremo federal Antonin Scalia ha aprovechado todas sus apariciones públicas para difundir su opinión en contra del matrimonio gay y lo que ha denominado como una decisión inconstitucional. [read post]