Search for: "COOPER v. LONG"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 3,364
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Some academic critics of Roe v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 11:43 am
That is, my consent to search substitutes for a warrant as long as the officer's search stays within the scope of what I've consented to. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:49 am
Fortenberry v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:03 pm
(Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:29 am
State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 4:24 pm
Specifically, he claimed that those counts did not sufficiently allege statutory aggravating factors, as required by Ring v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 8:08 pm
By Cori Badgley In Gray v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:20 pm
Cooper jokingly describes this hearing as Paulson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 5:54 pm
The Supreme Court made that clear in Zadvydas v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 2:36 pm
Ever since Roe v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
We are all enormously grateful to Christine Korsgaard for her characteristically lucid and insightful lecture on the basis of animal entitlements. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:03 pm
This is a long, long ways from the need for the taking in Berman v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 3:27 am
The controversy turns an interpretation of Cleveland v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 2:41 am
We are fairly confident that many of our readers are well aware that the CIC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2008, 2:02 pm
The case of Greater Bombay Co-Op Bank Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 1:36 pm
The case, Common Cause of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
