Search for: "California State Bar Court"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 11,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2007, 1:55 am
The Court of Appeals is Virginia's intermediate appellate court (not to be confused with Maryland's Court of Appeals being that state's highest court). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:22 am
State of CA - IHSS v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:17 pm
The attorney may be required to inform the client of the nature and scope of the contract between attorney and out-of-state company if the brief provided is a significant development in the representation or if the work is a cost which must be disclosed to the client under California law. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 12:43 pm
The focus was on the current and future state of patent litigation. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:32 am
The plaintiff had argued that a strong policy against the forum selection clause in the forum, a federal district court in California, was implied by the Exchange Act’s anti-waiver provision, the Exchange Act’s provision making federal courts the exclusive forum for Exchange Act claims, Delaware state caselaw, and federal courts’ general obligation to hear cases over which they have jurisdiction.The panel rejected all of the… [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 9:21 am
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
21 May 2018, 12:34 pm
Even if those new arguments prove to be unavailing – to date, the California state courts have held that such claims cannot be compelled to arbitration because they belong to the state, not the employee –the Supreme Court’s decision could be used to require that an individual arbitrate his or her individual claims first such that he or she would not have standing to pursue the PAGA claims if the employer prevailed in arbitration. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:20 pm
While both parties focused on California law, plaintiff argued that if her case was time-barred under California law, the court should consider Illinois law because that is where the case was originally filed. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:27 am
Turtle (Lacey Act; Endangered Species)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlInterest of D.E.D.I (Indian Child Welfare Act - Expert Witnesses)Tribal Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2019.htmlCorporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:27 am
Turtle (Lacey Act; Endangered Species)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlInterest of D.E.D.I (Indian Child Welfare Act - Expert Witnesses)Tribal Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2019.htmlCorporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:05 pm
The court pointed to material conflicts between the consumer protection laws of California and other states (such as a scienter requirement of some state consumer protection laws but not others). [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 11:52 am
CA Bill Requiring Qualifying Inmates to Pay for Imprisonment Fails: Torey Van Oot of the Sacramento Bee reports SB 1124, which would require the courts to order those who could afford to pay for part of their stay in state prison or county jail to do so, failed today by a 2-3 vote in the California Senate Public Safety Committee. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Does the Marbury principle bar jurisdiction in EPIC’s case? [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 12:38 pm
The Texas Supreme Court ordered the state to compensate a man who was wrongfully convicted of sexual assault and spent nearly 20 years in prison. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:10 pm
As the court held, "Res judicata, however, does not bar Mayport Village's claims because it lacks privity with any plaintiff in the previous Earth Island litigation… Mayport Village's claims are dismissed without prejudice to refiling in a proper venue. [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:44 am
Although a plaintiff is barred from bringing suit in federal court based on the federal Takings Clause, the same claim could be brought in state court against the state or state officials. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 6:59 pm
In others, it is not a bar to a claim as in California. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 9:54 am
Browndorf was barred from arguing that there was a violation of California Civil Code §1785.25, since federal law blocked that claim. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:40 am
The court had previously issued temporary restraining orders barring release of pre-2019 records pending full consideration on the merits of the petitions. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
The anti-gay policy has been struck down by a federal judge in California, but that ruling has been stayed since Nov. 1, and the Pentagon in the meantime has enforced the ban. [read post]
