Search for: "Caming v. United States" Results 3141 - 3160 of 9,168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
On a motion by President Shrum, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed the suit for lack of standing, ruling that the United States Supreme Court in Summers v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 That’s not to say that the United States in, say, 1790 had no possible future as a just and legitimate polity unless a civil war would come and set things straight. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 7:00 am by Jordan Brunner
” Jennifer Harris asked if it’s time for new rules regarding Chinese investment in the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:11 am by Tim K. Garrett and Maja Hartzell
In a recent decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a lateral job transfer can – in certain circumstances – be an illegal adverse action and support a claim for a lawsuit for unlawful discrimination. [read post]
14 May 2014, 5:02 am
  The Court of Appeals begins its opinion by explaining that[t]his appeal arises from a lawsuit filed by [Fasteners for Retail] FFR in an unrelated matter in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Constitution, commits the power to make foreign policy, including the decisions to permit or forbid entry into the United States, to the President and Congress. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:19 am by Lyle Denniston
United States (11-955) and Scrushy v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 1:40 pm by David Urban
Elsasser, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (the federal appellate court covering California), held that a California school district potentially violated a field trip vendor’s First Amendment rights. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:10 am by Aditi Shah
In the Jennings case, Alejandro Rodriguez, a Mexican citizen and lawful permanent resident in the United States, represented a class certified under Rule 23(b)(2). [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:09 pm
The one good thing about this case, is that it obliquely cites a case with a cool name:  United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:30 am by Danielle Citron
  She later represented the United States as the ambassador to Italy. [read post]
27 May 2024, 3:49 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Moreover, one thinks of an undocumented immigrants as a person who entered the United States without inspection or who came to the US legally on a visa and overstayed. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:34 am by Joy Waltemath
That same month, a federal district court in South Texas issued an injunction in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:40 pm by Ellen Marrus
The United States Supreme Court today continued with its line of cases favoring children in the decisions of Miller v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:22 am by SHG
  Not that it was some long-haired hippie throw-back to the Warren Court, but that there was a long tradition of the top court refusing to trot in lock-step with the United States Supreme Court when it came to finding novel excuses to ignore the Bill of Rights, or the local flavor, Article I, § 12 of the New York Constitution. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:35 am
This is consistent with years past and largely reflects the prevalence of the flu shot in the United States. [read post]