Search for: "Childs v. State"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 21,041
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
The UCCJEA vests Family Court with jurisdiction over neglect proceedings when, inter alia,, New York “is the home state of the child on the date of the commencement of the proceeding, or was the home state of the child within six months before the commencement of the proceeding and the child is absent from this state but a parent or person acting as a parent continues to live in this state” (Domestic Relations Law §… [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 7:11 pm
In Riley v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 5:38 pm
Holiday child custody and visitation was recently discussed by the Florida Court of Appeal in a case captioned Glevis v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
Legal abortion obviously conveys a “benefit” in a comparative sense: not abortion as an absolute good but legal abortion as compared to a back-alley butcher or to state-enforced child-bearing. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm
In the 2014 case Burwell v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:26 am
Berger v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 5:00 am
That law prohibits providing material support to foreign terrorist organizations that the State Department designates, in a formal process that permits organizations to appeal the designation. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:54 am
” Like the Obama Administration, the Biden-Harris plan recognizes the critical role of caretaking (both paid child and elder care and parental care). [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 2:38 pm
January 30, 2021 State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 1:38 pm
Hartigan v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 6:32 am
In Spearman v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 2:35 am
Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 2:00 pm
The law was a frontal assault on our constitutional rights — in fact, the government of Guam argued that the right to abortion did not even apply to Guam at all — and was the most restrictive ban enacted in the United States since the Supreme Court had decided Roe v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:27 am
Hearing the case in question, Satish Ragde v State of Maharashtra, on appeal last week, Justice Pushpa Ganediwala, sitting on the Nagpur Bench of the High court, held that there must be “skin to skin contact with sexual intent” for an act to be considered sexual assault under Section 7 of POSCO. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 8:51 am
M.C. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 12:24 pm
As we have seen in certain high-profile cases (Tfue v. [read post]
