Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 16,698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen discusses McWilliams v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 6:31 pm
For example, in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 6:21 am
S. 232, 236 (1974) , but whether his complaint was sufficient to cross the federal court’s threshold, see Swierkiewicz v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:47 am
” The court brought up US v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 7:28 am
-v- Powers) that the 2006 federal law requiring state sex offenders to register with law-enforcement officials when they move across state lines was largely a local issue.The ruling, made in two unrelated sex-offender cases pending in Orlando, led to the dismissal of charges against Robert D. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 5:48 am
Per Papineau v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:30 am
The most recent bipartisan proposal would, in many cases, require detention of minors (in violation of the 1997 Flores v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 2:46 pm
Mayton v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:25 pm
(See opinion in Pausch v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:35 pm
Cross posted at Life Sentence Blog. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:27 am
Contract breach and state labor law claims. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 5:00 am
-EV]Part I of this series placed Texas v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm
The first defendant further states that plaintiff was not being an attentive road user as the he said he only saw the first defendant for a split second. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
Hartsock v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
Hartsock v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 8:16 am
In a decision that provides important guidelines on the competence of, and co-operation between, national data protection authorities (DPAs), the ECJ has clarified how data protection law applies in cross-border situations within the EU (Weltimmo sro v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság C-230/14). [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Doe and Doe v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 5:29 pm
Patrick notes: In Hogan-Cross v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 7:57 am
The ruling, from the Appellate Division Second Department, upholds a finding reached by the State Division of Human Rights, which ruled in 2015 that Advanced Recovery, Inc., offered pretextual, or false, reasons for terminating Erin Fuller's employment.The case is Advanced Recovery, Inc. v. [read post]
