Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 3141 - 3160 of 29,817
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2021, 10:18 am by Stacie Rosenzweig
One particularly egregious case involved a murder defendant sentenced to death. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm by Sasha Volokh
This is true whether the parties are public or private: a judge may not be compensated out of the fines he collects from defendants he convicts, and private residents may not exercise zoning power over their neighbors. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
., 909 F.3d 257 (9th Cir. 2018), is not to the contrary, because Netflix used the mark in a different context, as opposed to using it exactly the same way the plaintiffs do. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 10:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Defendants argued that, under In re GNC Corp., 789 F.3d 505 (4th Cir. 2015), their expert’s testimony that the two products were genetically and functionally equivalent precluded a finding of literal falsity as a matter of law. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
In June 2018, based upon allegations that respondent Reymond F. was the child’s father, Reymond F. was added as a named respondent to the petition. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 11:27 am
Parke Davis, Inc., 746 F.2d 517, 520 (9th Cir. 1984) (“The United States was unaware that Mr. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
The jury returned a verdict in favor of the Defendant. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 11:44 am by Christiana Wayne
Oversee all other legal services performed within the NSA to include acquisition, human resources, and other enabling functions as well as determining the adherence by attorneys to appropriate professional standards, subject to DOD Instruction 1442.02. f. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 10:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
N.V.E., Inc., 694 F.3d 723 (6th Cir. 2012), was not to the contrary. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:54 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
“[I]f the proof of a fact lies wholly with one witness, and he both affirms and denies it, and there is no explanation, it cannot stand otherwise than unproven. [read post]