Search for: "Doe 103"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 3,234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2007, 6:19 pm
For racial minorities, this caveat does not apply. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:29 pm
Snyder smiling at them right now on page 103. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 11:52 am
Source: Pharmalot » Scraping The Bottom Of The Medical Barrel: Despite Sanctions, Docs Get Paid For Studies BofA is down with the OCC: Most people don't know what the OCC is, let alone what it does. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 7:40 am
In a fit of nostalgia, Pangloss feels like posting that the 3rd Scottish Information Commissioner Report has been published (even though Pangloss now does not live in Scotland and tries to avoid FOI like the plague.)Still, it does seem kinda remarkable though that:"1082 appeals [have been] received in the two years since the inception of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act (including 511 appeals in 2006) - twice as many applications as the Information Commissioner in… [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 4:33 pm
.) *** Garden Ridge Management, Inc. (16-CA-22275, 22756; 349 NLRB No. 103) Dallas, TX May 18, 2007. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 1:04 pm
(c) Conditions for Patentability; Nonobvious Subject Matter- Section 103 is amended--(1) in subsection (a)--(A) by striking `A patent may not be obtained through the invention' and inserting `A patent for the claimed invention may not be obtained through the claimed invention';(B) by striking `sought to be patented' and inserting `of the claimed invention'; and(C) by striking `at the time the invention was made' and inserting `before the effective filing date of the… [read post]
30 May 2007, 3:52 am
As I read the cases, three circuits-the Fifth, Eighth, and Eleventh-have arguably held that the government employer does not have a disclosure obligation. [read post]
25 May 2007, 9:10 am
., 2007 NSSC 155 , Justice Warner ruled that the occupational health and safety legislation of Nova Scotia does not apply to a fishing vessel based out of Nova Scotia. [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:09 pm
KSR rationale: Such a combination of familiar elements according to known methods is likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results. [read post]
24 May 2007, 8:27 am
If we own four Units, then once every 28 days, Elizabeth moves from 101 in 102, Charles moves from 102 into 103, William from 103 to 104, Henry from 104 back into 101. [read post]
23 May 2007, 2:20 pm
The underpinnings of the report A PATENT SYSTEM FOR THE 21ST CENTURY are rather interesting in being supported by a contract coming from NASA:[The study "AERONAUTICS INNOVATION: NASA'S CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES" was supported by Contract # NASW-99037, Task Order #103 between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the SAME contract which supported "A Patent System for the 21st Century", but the NASA study on… [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:39 am
., at 103 (KENNEDY, J., concurring); Summers, supra, at 704-705. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:32 am
Does it seem appropriate to talk about "runaway orange prices"? [read post]
21 May 2007, 9:08 pm
Does plagiarism require intent? [read post]
19 May 2007, 1:46 pm
Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n, 489 U.S. 602, 616, 109 S.Ct. 1402, 1413, 103 L.Ed.2d 639 (1989) (drug and alcohol testing of railroad employees), Schmerber v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
" Now, does that sound like Cooper v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
" Now, does that sound like Cooper v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
Moreover, in none of those four cases does the Federal Circuit apply the holding of Sakraida. [read post]
5 May 2007, 7:57 am
The legislation is self funding, would reduce recidivism, strengthen family relations, and increase reporting of in-prison conditions and abuse.Reduce staffing ratios, abuse at TYC facilitiesSB 103 by Hinojosa (see here and here) has cleared the House Corrections Committee and is ready to be substituted for its companion, HB 2807, on next week's House calendar. [read post]
4 May 2007, 3:56 pm
HOWEVER, this text does NOT consider that the case being blown away by the Supreme Court on the "obvious to try" business was In re Deuel, cited with FAVOR by the CAFC in its non-precedential decision in KSR, but basically killed off by the Supreme Court. [read post]
