Search for: "Does 1 - 41" Results 3141 - 3160 of 4,707
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
This also means that it does not define a multiplicity of varieties which necessarily consists of s [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:22 am by Susan Brenner
Attorney forthe Northern District of Ohio in September of 2011, a Cleveland federal grand jury indicted Jason Jurek, “age 41,” with “with receiving visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, and possessing child pornography” in violation of federal law. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:28 am
Sims, 428 F.3d at 955 (one-day delay in executing search warrant does not justify suppression because warrant was executed within the period prescribed by Rule 41, probable cause to search still existed and police did not intentionally disregard warrant's terms; "[because] non-prejudicial and unintentional violations of Rule 41 do not result in suppression, then a fortiori technical violations of the warrant itself compel the same result"); United States v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 12:21 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  The ALJ agreed with Apple and the Commission Investigative Staff (“OUII”) that “TFCI encoding apparatus” is not a limitation and thus does not require construction. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:24 pm by Mandelman
Homeowners in California had better get serious about this issue and fast. [read post]
28 May 2012, 2:02 am
It does not appear as though Bird actually injured any of the troopers. [read post]
25 May 2012, 10:21 am by Silvio Cappellari and Maria Held
The implementation of a transaction in disregard of a notification obligation under German merger control regime leads to the invalidity of the implementing steps (Section 41(1) ARC). [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:24 am by Susan Brenner
Bank ATM indicating $600.00 had been withdrawn from Becker's U.S. bank account at 5:41 a.m. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm by Pace Law School Library
  Private policing of environmental performance:  does it further public goals? [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm by John Steele
[9]          Later in his Reasons, in addressing the plaintiff’s opposition to the trial of this action being moved to Hamilton, in part because of his concern that he could not likely get a fair jury trial in Hamilton, the Master went on to say the following:  [41] In this case, I see no advantage in choosing a “neutral” site. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The Circuit panel divided 2-1 last Friday in upholding the 1965 Act. [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:37 pm by admin
The portable breath test and the breathalyzer used to determine your blood alcohol content has flaws and does not always provide perfect results. [read post]