Search for: "Does 1 through 5" Results 3141 - 3160 of 24,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2019, 12:24 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Claim 1 of the first auxiliary request differs from claim 1 of the main request in that "environment" has been replaced with "building structure".XI. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 12:20 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
’ ” But that case involved a “voted#1 best show in Vegas! [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
The application was rejected pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of the CTM Regulation and the examiner stated that Maharishi had failed to prove that the sign had acquired distinctive character through use in Belgium and France, ex Article 7(3). [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 5:48 am by David Pocklington
Note: Applications for the study beginning in the 2024/5 academic year must be received by the end of July. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:08 am by Dan Harris
China is more difficult today than it was 3-5 years ago. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:27 pm by David Bernstein
Mass. 1-11-24) (complaint) (1) As in previous complaints related to university antisemitism, I find that the strongest claims are that (a) the university refuses to enforce its own, content-neutral, rules (In this context, for example, I can't see any legitimate reason for HLS to allow pro-Hamas students to take over Casperson lounge); and (b) the  university reacts quite differently to complaints of antisemitism than it does to complaints of other sorts of bias,… [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 1:57 pm by Biersdorf & Associates
Section 13 (amending N.J.S.A. 40A:12A-5) revises the criteria used to determine if an area is blighted. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:49 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Legislative Note: States that have enacted the Uniform Parentage Act (2000, as amended) should replace “applicable state law” in paragraph (5) with “Section 201(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Uniform Parentage Act (2000), as amended”. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:13 pm
 Not surprising.So where does methamphetamine fall along this line? [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 2:13 am by Jan von Hein
Schack: Does Art. 27 Lugano Convention permit requiring a special legitimate interest in actions for negative declaratory relief? [read post]