Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 7,366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
Home Office v Essop & Ors; Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 14-15 November 2016. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 6:11 am
In the Second Circuit, which includes New York, the test for confusion is that as laid down in the Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:48 am
” State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 1:47 pm
JGE v The English Province of Our Lady of Charity & Anor [2011] EWHC 2871 (QB). [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 2:11 am
Following the landmark ruling by the Supreme Court in Unwired Planet v Huawei, which stated that English courts can decide FRAND terms on a worldwide basis, English courts have become a popular forum for litigating SEP related disputes and it seems that they will likely continue to be so. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
In form 1001E it kept the pre-checked box at 6-1 that states that all European Patent Convention (EPC) contract states are designated. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:57 pm
The English beheaded Mary, Queen of Scots, in 1587, but her trial took place before an English court. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 7:07 am
American Honda Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000); English v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
Flores (08-289 and 08-294), on whether the courts below improperly declined to modify an injunction against Arizona for failing to provide sufficient funding for non-English speaking school children. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 3:20 pm
” Weyerhaeuser Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 12:57 am
V. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
See Final Decree, in Transcript of Re cord, West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
TLU v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2217. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
for claims against its subsidiary – sometimes with success, sometimes not: For example, in Okpabi & Ors v Royal Dutch Shell Plc & Anor, the English High Court, Queen’s Bench Division, by its Technology and Construction Court, decided that it had no international jurisdiction to hear claims in tort against the Nigerian subsidiary (SPDC) of Royal Dutch Shell (RDC) in connection with environmental and health damages due to oil pollution in the context of the… [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:56 am
He stated that “In a case like the present, the parties have made their own law by contracting, and can in principle un-make or re-make it”. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:04 am
United States. [read post]
