Search for: "English v. English" Results 3141 - 3160 of 11,208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2008, 10:36 pm
There simply is no way to reconcile FCC v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 12:53 am by Chukwuma Okoli
This article proposes a solution, based on a uniform characterisation of the clause as a whole, which protects the lender’s option and mitigates the risk of parallel proceedings TD Grant, “Arbitration, Corruption and Post-Award Control in French and English Courts” In September 2021, the French Cour de Cassation reversed the annulment that the Paris Cour d’appel earlier had granted in regard to an arbitral award in Alexander Brothers… [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:40 am by INFORRM
This should not be taken as an attack on the approach the English courts have taken in the recent reported cases. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:41 am by Adam Swierczewski and Eleni Pilaviou
Introduction Under English law, charterers’ obligation to pay hire as it falls due is absolute but the right to withdraw a vessel in case of default in charterers’ obligation to pay does not arise automatically. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 5:01 am by SHG
Sullum notes the Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 3:39 am
In Axa Corporate Solutions SA v National Westminster Bank Plc & Marsh Ltd [2010] EWHC 1915 (Comm) Axa sought a declaration by the Court that a terrorism exclusion clause had been incorporated into its renewal of a public and products liability (PPL) policy with RBS, of which NatWest is a group company. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 9:56 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
See also, Julio César Betancourt, Damages for breach of an international arbitration agreement under English arbitration law, Arbitration International, Volume 34, Issue 4, December 2018, Pages 511–532, https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiy030. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 12:38 pm
 Yes, I fully understand that I am terrible at spelling, and grammar, and pretty much everything else remotely associated with the English language. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 2:53 am
The same could have been said of recent decisions at first instance on the corporate veil (particularly Ben Hashem v Shayif), until two magisterial judgments of the Court of Appeal this year: VTB Capital v Nutritek and, last week, Petrodel v Michael Prest. [read post]