Search for: "Fair v. State" Results 3141 - 3160 of 27,759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2018, 6:53 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE MATRIX
That meant that the Government had to show that a fair balance had been struck between competing interests. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:49 am
The Class Action Fairness Act ("CAFA") allows aggregation of individual claims in a class action to determine whether the jurisdictional requirements for removal to federal court are met, but does not allow class actions themselves may be aggregated, according to Marple v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Nor were the comments “based upon, or were a fair and accurate account of, facts that were substantially true or sufficiently identified. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 12:01 pm
 It's certainly more important to get these types of cases right than it is out crank out an opinion speedily that's wrong.But one downside of certification is that it often ends up taking a fair amount of time. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:50 am by Carl Folsom
Ivory issue (applying Apprendi to facts of criminal history)State v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:19 am by Marty Schwimmer
Cambridge University Press v Becker (ND. [read post]
29 May 2016, 7:39 pm by Marija Xenakis
Section 119(1)(a) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) states that an employee is entitled to be paid redundancy pay by the employer  if the employment is terminated at the employer’s initiative because the employer no longer requires the job done by the employee to be done by anyone, except where this is due to the ordinary and customary turnover of labour (the Exception). [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:57 am by nickleydorf
Filed under: Attorney/Lawyer, Criminal Law, Evidence Tagged: forfeiture of constitutional right, Michigan Court of Appeals, People v Vaughn [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 9:44 am by Steven G. Pearl
The Supreme Court of the United States on Wednesday heard oral argument in a case that should help determine the scope of the Fair Labor Standards Act's (FLSA) anti-retaliation provision.In Kasten v. [read post]