Search for: "Germany v. Germany"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 4,535
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2012, 5:15 am
Gore and Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:05 am
Shaun discusses the Second Circuit’s decision in Townsend v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:04 pm
The Court’s opinion in Christopher v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
As might be expected, the topics covered include patents, standards and competition law, not to mention a smattering of European caselaw involving Apple and IPCom v Nokia. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
Case C-137/12 European Commission v Council of the European Union is a battle of the Euro-titans, with the European Commission picking on the Council on a matter of policy as well as principle. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:33 am
Talmon (Univ. of Bonn - Law) has posted Jus Cogens after Germany v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:42 am
Germany thus need not necessarily have recognized such a rule for it to become an integral part of federal law. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:19 am
[Germany ] [Habitual Residence] In Hamprecht v Hamprecht, 2012 WL 1890857 (M.D.Fla.) [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Other cases included: Mr Peter Light v Hounslow Chronicle, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; RMT Union v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; A man v The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 3, 15/06/2012; A man v Irish News, Clause 3, 15/06/2012; Mr Martin Robbins v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mr Colin Cortbus v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 4, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v Daily… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:10 am
Law » Germany. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:35 am
Accordingly, the Court weighed this factor against a likelihood of deception or confusion given that the First Respondent sold its grapes on the local market to cooperatives, whereas the applicants exported their wine to Germany. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 3:24 am
Germany Claudia Schubert, Whistle-Blowing after Heinisch v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:07 am
The court’s reasoning The CJEU has previously held that penalties laid down in rules of the common agricultural policy, such as the temporary exclusion of an economic operator from the benefit of an aid scheme, are not of a criminal nature (see Case 137/85 Maizena and Others [1987] ECR 4587, paragraph 13; Case C-240/90 Germany v Commission [1992] ECR I-5383, paragraph 25; and Case C-210/00 Käserei Champignon Hofmeister [2002] ECR… [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:21 pm
Trapp & Alex Mills, Smooth Runs the Water Where the Brook Is Deep: The Obscured Complexities of Germany v Italy Francesco Messineo, Maps Of Ephemeral Empires: The ICJ and the Macedonian Name Dispute Thomas R. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:54 am
The Strasbourg Court has ruled in Öztürk v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 4:27 pm
He understands that, since this event clashes with both the Greece v Czech Republic and the Poland v Russia EURO 2012 football matches, there will be fewer Greeks, Czechs, Poles and Russians present. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 12:57 am
One of the earliest “privacy” cases was Wyatt v Wilson in 1820. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:24 am
Supreme Court decision in Brown v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 5:03 pm
Since the world’s first investment treaty was signed between Pakistan and Germany in 1959, more than 2500 treaties have come into force involving most countries in the world. [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:43 pm
He referred to Mann J’s judgment in Tillery Valley Foods v. [read post]
