Search for: "In re A. V." Results 3141 - 3160 of 62,913
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2009, 2:37 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Swindon Borough Council v Redpath [2009] EWCA Civ 943 (11 September 2009) High Court (Commercial Court) Macquarie Internationale Investments Ltd v Glencore UK Ltd [2009] EWHC 2267 (Comm) (17 September 2009) High Court (Family Division) H (A Child), Re [2009] EWHC 2280 (Fam) (11 September 2009) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:18 am
High Court (Family Division) RB (A Child), Re [2009] EWHC B26 (Fam) (10 November 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Atanasova v The Governor of HMP Holloway & Anor [2009] EWHC 2740 (Admin) (04 November 2009) High Court (Commercial Court) Rainy Sky SA & Ors v Kookmin Bank [2009] EWHC 2624 (Comm) (29 October 2009) Source: www.bailii.org [...] [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 4:17 pm
If you’re interested in constitutional constraints on judicial power — related to justiciability, standing, and the like — check out yesterday’s Oregon Supreme Court decision in Couey v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:03 pm
"Bad news: We're unanimously affirming your conviction and death sentence. [read post]
27 May 2016, 10:18 pm by ligitsec
On October 14, Judge Denise Cote of the Southern District of New York ruled that a cell phone service provider does not need a public performance license when it provides ringtones to its customers. [read post]
27 May 2016, 10:18 pm by ligitsec
On October 14, Judge Denise Cote of the Southern District of New York ruled that a cell phone service provider does not need a public performance license when it provides ringtones to its customers. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
BPI * Another Murky Opinion on Lawyers Buying Keyword Ads on Other Lawyers’ Names–In re Naert * Keyword Ad Lawsuit Isn’t Covered By California’s Anti-SLAPP Law * Confusion From Competitive Keyword Advertising? [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 10:53 am by Marty Schwimmer
AFP argues that the Twitter terms of service granted them a royalty-free license as a sub-licensee of Twitter or it is a third-party beneficiary of Twitter's terms of service with Morel, allowing for re-distribution. [read post]