Search for: "In re Miller "
Results 3141 - 3160
of 4,270
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
(While the opinion notes the trial court rejected Respondents’ and Real Parties’ “various procedural defenses” – which were not specified in the opinion, but which in fact included statute of limitations, mootness, and res judicata/collateral estoppel – the Court of Appeal expressly declined to reach these issues, stating in a footnote: “We need not address the Ohlsons’ various procedural defenses because we affirm the trial… [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
“This is the precise bullet that the trial court correctly dodged in Miller v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 5:04 pm
(CEQA Guidelines, § 15124; In re Bay-Delta, etc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143, 1175.) [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
CEQA Litigation/Procedural Issues Various of California’s District Courts of Appeal rendered notable decisions on a number of issues relating to the procedures and rules governing the conduct of CEQA litigation, including the following holdings: Res judicata will not apply to bar a subsequent action on the same claim between the same parties unless the first judgment was on the merits. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 10:40 am
Against the backdrop of another severe drought, water supply and impact issues continue to be points of contention for water agencies, water users, conservation groups, and the state. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 6:23 am
But Miller was not what he appeared to be. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
With that, we’re ready for the new business. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm
., §§ 15161, 15168, 15385, 15152), and relied heavily on what it found to be an analogous Supreme Court decision – In re Bay-Delta, etc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143 – which held that specific details about a second-tier project (the Environmental Water Account, or EWA) that were released shortly before certification of the first-tier PEIS/R for the CALFED Program need not have been included in the PEIS/R. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
In December 2014, it notified LandWatch it had additional documents it would mail upon receiving $34.80 in costs, but LandWatch did not request these documents until March 2015, at which time District had to re-gather them, and they were produced in April 2015. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 1:21 pm
” (Citing and quoting from In re Bay-Delta Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Coordinated Proceedings (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143, 1163-1166.) [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:31 pm
These firms are allegedly complicit in the scheme as they are willing to submit false CEQA reports for improper purposes. (8/7/19 Order re Motion to Dismiss, at 1:20-2:17.) [read post]
23 May 2024, 4:54 pm
Following supplemental briefing on these issues, and on whether discharge was precluded because only part of the original project was re-approved, the trial court discharged the writ in December 2023, and STC appealed that discharge order. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:40 am
The goal is to “re-envision and revitalize” the neglected Parnassus campus to retain UCSF’s status as a leading and “world-renowned medical complex, research center, and professional school. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 4:44 pm
Circuit emphatically found the Supreme Court’s Nixon and Morrison decisions were binding when Miller challenged Mueller’s appointment in the case in re Grand Jury Investigation. [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:04 pm
We also re-posted a discussion of the case from the always thoughtful Law Think blog. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
(In Re Farmers Ins. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 12:13 pm
Her examples: In re Wiggins, a 2001 Idaho case involving Peachtree Settlement Funding, and the Fresno County cases involving 321 Henderson (a J.G. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:16 am
Certainly the CCA's record on Batson challenges, most famously in the Miller-El case, decided by the US Supreme Court in 2005, can hardly be described as sympathetic toward Batson claims. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 9:05 pm
Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller announced President Donald J. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:50 am
Miller also has been the largest donor to the Real Conservatives National Committee, giving $22,500 to the super PAC. [read post]
