Search for: "Jacob Rule"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 3,167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2006, 4:36 am
"I truly believe that there is a new UK doctrine based on the latest UK-based software patent rulings. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 7:28 am
This ruling is in Helmet Integrated Systems Ltd v Mitchell Tunnard and others [2006] EWCA Civ 1735, reported here on BAILII.Helmet made and sold protective equipment, including a popular fire fighters' helmet. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 4:02 am
Capra, Philip Reed Professor at Fordham Law School, to discuss amendments to Federal Rules of Evidence 404(a), 408, 606(b), and 609(a) that went into effect on On Dec. 1, 2006.
Intellectual PropertyThursday, December 7, 2006By Alan J. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 1:34 am
The effect of this rule is that the media can be prevented from publishing something where that publication could have an impact on the court’s ruling. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 11:34 pm
The effect of this rule is that the media can be prevented from publishing something where that publication could have an impact on the court's ruling. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 3:43 pm
In his opinion * There could be no blanket rule that an adulterer could never restrain the publication of matters relating to his adulterous relationship. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 2:01 am
This was InterDigital's appeal from the ruling of Mr Justice Pumfrey (noted here by the IPKat) in which he refused either to set aside proceedings brought by Nokia or to give summary judgment against that company.The background is a little messy. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:10 am
" Consistent to the last, the answer of Jacob LJ (at para.77) is a final "no".Earlier IPKat note (promising a more detail analysis that never happened) and link to first instance ruling hereInteresting things about bubbles hereWhat's inside a bubble - and why do bubbles pop? [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 2:12 pm
New York is the exception that proves the rule; elsewhere else in the U.S., no one rushes downtown in the evening just to hang out with other people. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 4:32 am
To Halliburton's surprise and disappointment, this settlement did not have the effect of revalidating the patent (see earlier ruling to that effect here, plus IPKat's comment here). [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 1:40 pm
Think Jane Jacobs diversity. [read post]
18 Nov 2006, 9:09 am
Maximizing Your E-Potential is by Jacob Williams. [read post]
18 Nov 2006, 7:39 am
Per Jacob Sullum (Nov. 14), Yesterday a federal judge in Louisiana rejected a motion to dismiss [the Competitive Enterprise Institute's] lawsuit challenging the Master Settlement Agreement that established a government-backed cigarette cartel for the benefit of state treasuries, trial lawyers, and the leading tobacco companies. [read post]
11 Nov 2006, 9:16 am
Jacob's Law Dictionary explicitly stated that a criminal petit (trial) jury's role was was to decide both questions of fact and law. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 5:52 am
Jacobs, 298 F.2d 469, 472 (4th Cir.1961) (suggesting that sua sponte relief may be appropriate under Rule 60(b) in some cases).FN3. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 7:52 am
It was argued in July, just after Disney came down, before Holland, Berger, and Jacobs, JJ. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 4:18 am
I enjoy quoting John Chrysostom, the Midrash, and of course the antinomian heretic Jacob Frank. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 12:28 pm
It offends against the rule of law and the principles of good governance. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 12:33 am
I've finished reading Aerotel v Telco Holdings, and I have to say that I have been impressed with a lot of the excellent reasoning displayed by Lord Justice Jacob in the ruling. [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 12:41 pm
A patent on a method of making a telephone call from any available telephone was allowed (in re Aerotel) whereas an automated method of acquiring the documents necessary to incorporate a company was ruled non-patentable. [read post]
