Search for: "Kennedy Thomas"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 4,886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 6:32 am
The remarkable thing about this ruling is Justice Thomas's dissenting opinion.The case is Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:18 pm
Each one (and especially Kennedy) has a pretty strong free speech libertarian streak. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:53 pm
It is a fragmented opinion, with Justice Ginsburg this time in the dissent, Justice Breyer concurring, and Justice Kennedy (joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Scalia and Thomas) delivering the plurality opinion. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 3:43 pm
The Chief Justice and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito created the majority in 63% of 5-4 decisions, their highest success and cohesion rate during the Roberts Court. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
Kennedy, and Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:17 pm
Chief Justice Roberts wrote the majority opinion, joined by Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas and Alito. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:00 pm
Justice Kennedy wrote the plurality opinion, which was joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Scalia and Thomas. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:49 am
Justice Kennedy wrote the opinion and was joined by Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Scalia and Justice Thomas. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:53 am
The majority, which held that such games were broadly protected, consisted of three women (Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan) and two men (Justices Scalia and Kennedy), and the concurrence in the judgment and the dissents, all of which were open to some substantial regulation of such games, consisted of four men (Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Breyer, and Alito).Of course the results in the violent video game case likely didn’t have much to do with the… [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:42 am
Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan joined the majority opinion.Justice Samuel A. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:43 am
Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan concur.Justice Alito, joined by Chief Justice Roberts, concur in the judgment. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:37 am
By a vote of 5-to-4 (with Chief Justice Roberts writing, and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito joining him), the Supreme Court held today that the Arizona law (and presumably therefore others around the nation like it) is unconstitutional because it violates the free-speech rights of the privately-funded candidates: Here is the begining of Justice Kagan's dissent: Imagine two States, each plagued by a corrupt political system. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:03 am
Kennedy announced the judgment of the Court in J. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:27 am
Justices Thomas and Breyer dissented; Justice Alito, joined by Chief Justice Roberts, concurred in the judgment. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:25 am
Justice Scalia wrote the opinion for the Court, joined by Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Kagan and Sotomayor. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:26 am
The dissenters – Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Alito – read both FELA and Rogers differently. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:56 am
" It's kind of a rough mirror-image to Laurence Tribe's New York Times op-ed, which Barnett has criticized (and which I didn't care for either), which sought to buck up the liberal members of the Court and encourage Kennedy to join them on the healthcare litigation. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 7:07 am
Roberts agreed with that decision, and was joined in his judgment by Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:58 am
Kennedy and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm
But Justice Ginsburg treats the matter delicately, presumably because formality was (unfortunately) essential for Justice Thomas’s vote. [read post]
