Search for: "Law v. USA"
Results 3141 - 3160
of 6,906
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2015, 5:31 am
In Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 10:19 am
(The actual malice test goes back to the Supreme Court’s landmark New York Times v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:04 am
One of the most important reforms in USA Freedom is the section that directs the FISA Court to appoint an amicus curiae to argue in any case involving novel or significant interpretations of the law. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:25 am
CDM Media USA – Age Discrimination Lawsuit to Proceed, March 12, 2015, Costa Mesa Wage and Hour Lawyer Blog [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:49 am
And the European Court of Justice may refer to the USA FREEDOM Act in a positive light when ruling on the validity of Safe Harbor in the Schrems v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:03 pm
On a motion for summary judgment, this Court's role is limited to finding triable issues, not deciding factual questions that depend on the memory and credibility of witnesses (Rose v Da Ecib USA, 259 AD2d 258, 259). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:22 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Property Law Opinions Body: AC36500 - Castro v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
” Though the Lanham Act didn’t control here, Lanham Act precedent was “instructive” in construing the state laws here. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:47 am
Kern, Judicial protection against torpedo actions In the recent case Weber v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am
” Email the Roundup Team noteworthy law and security-r [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics | “IP litigation… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:17 am
Because Rightscorp therefore cannot satisfy the notice requirements of Section 512(c)(3)(A), a subpoena cannot be issued under Section 512(h). * BWP Media USA, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:04 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 8:50 am
Check it out: http://t.co/T8Xlvbrdvi — INTA (@INTA) May 14, 2015 Today’s 9th Cir en banc opinion in Garcia v Google is the most direct repudiation yet of ‘IP immigration. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
DHL Express (USA), Inc. 14-1225Issue: Whether common-law fraud claims are preempted by the Americans with Disabilities Act or by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 in the absence of a determination that such claims expressly reference air or motor carriers’ rates, routes, or services, or that entertaining such claims would have a significant economic effect on such rates, routes, or services. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:39 am
V. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court in Obergefell v. [read post]
