Search for: "Liability and Insurers for each Defendant" Results 3141 - 3160 of 3,441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2009, 4:16 pm
Louisiana Premises Liability Law offers insight and analysis on on premises liability law for businesses, porperty owners, insurers and risk managers. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 8:57 am
CGL - BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT - EMPLOYEE INJURY EXCLUSION - CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY EXCLUSION - CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE - FILING AND PRE-APPROVAL OF POLICY PROVISIONS Cipriani USA, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 2:49 pm
 This is not uncommon in BC Injury Claims were ICBC is the insurer for multiple at fault defendants. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 2:12 am
The typical D&O liability insurance policy would not likely cover any fines or penalties imposed on corporate officials for their control person liability, but their expenses incurred in defending against the claims likely would be covered under the typical policy, as would their defense expenses and any settlements or judgments against them in any follow-on civil litigation. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 5:28 am
Specifically, Colony argued that because both policies contain excess-insurance clauses, liability for defending the underlying case should be pro-rated between the two insurers based on the long-standing rule that, where two insurance policies covering the same risk contain excess-insurance clauses, the clauses are mutually repugnant and the loss should be apportioned between the two insurers on a prorata basis. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 12:57 pm
If I had to take just one, it might be Morris', but you can learn a lot from any of them, and you can learn stuff from each that you don't learn from either of the others. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
  The certified questions were whether an injured party who hadn’t established liability for the accident or  present right to settlement proceeds, and thus had only a  conditional right,  could assign that right to the provider, and whether the provider could then bring an action directly against the tortfeasor’s insurer. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 11:49 am
The court also cited Justice Souter's majority opinion in Exxon Shipping, which noted that the median ratio is less than 1-to-1 across the entire gamut of circumstances that can support punitive damages.Finally, when considering the third guidepost for evaluating punitive damages - - legislative or regulatory penalties for comparable misconduct - - the court rejected the plaintiff's argument that the defendant insurer could have been fined $10,000 under Insurance… [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 4:58 am
It must be some form of activity or association on the part of the defendants that warrants imposition of joint liability against the group even though the plaintiff may have dealt primarily with a single member. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
See Williams, 549 U.S. at 343, 356-57; State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 2:37 am
  Accompanying the February 9 motion were two settlement stipulations, one each with respect to the two groups of defendants. [read post]