Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 3141 - 3160 of 21,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2019, 8:37 am by Steven Cohen
  The plaintiff insurance company has filed a declaratory judgment against the defendant seeking a declaration that it is not liable to cover or indemnify the defendant under its non-trucking liability policy. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs commenced this action alleging, inter alia, professional negligence/legal malpractice and seeking damages purportedly arising from the representation of NAC by defendant Jenner & Block, LLP (JB) in the underlying action and the representation of NAC by defendant Harter, Secrest & Emery, LLP (HSE) in NAC’s subsequent bankruptcy proceeding. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 2:00 am
The defendant faced great exposure because the parties stipulated to more than $2 million in economic damages. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Where there’s a prime tortfeasor that is jointly and severally liable with every other defendant, that means one award. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 6:00 am by patrickdaniellaw
Damages to the consumer can include: Personal injuryWrongful deathInjury or damage to or loss of real or personal propertyEconomic lossDeclaratory, injunctive, or other equitable reliefA product liability action must be based on legal theory including, but not limited to: Strict Liability A defendant would be legally liable for the claimant’s injuries and damages regardless of whether there was any negligence or wrongdoing on the… [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 9:50 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The plaintiff has the burden of proving that the defendant is liable for whatever harm or injury they are claiming. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 9:44 am by tc
I mean, it actually might be a more fair way to look at it in many cases where a public defenders heavy workload means he/she isn’t ready for trial and has to ask for more time through no fault of the defendant, but still, this decision would turn speedy trial analysis upside down in Montana. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:10 am by Stephen M. Ozcomert
While defendants may be held liable for injuries that occur on their property due to dangers of which they were aware, but a plaintiff was not, they usually cannot be held liable for injuries when a plaintiff knows of a dangerous condition and proceeds anyway. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:10 am by Stephen M. Ozcomert
While defendants may be held liable for injuries that occur on their property due to dangers of which they were aware, but a plaintiff was not, they usually cannot be held liable for injuries when a plaintiff knows of a dangerous condition and proceeds anyway. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 11:38 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Instead, the plaintiff needs to prove that: The product was unreasonably dangerous; It left the defendants control in that state; The product’s defect was the cause of the plaintiff’s injuries; and No other party altered the product after it left the defendants control. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 10:35 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
In response, the hardware store claimed that it could not be held liable for the plaintiff’s injuries because the wet floor was open and obvious, and the store had placed “Caution: Wet Floor” signs across the floor. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 4:40 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Based on defendants affidavit, plaintiff filed suit for malicious prosecution against defendant. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:54 am by Unknown
However, they believe that when a government agency selects a forum that deprives a defendant of constitutional protections afforded to other similarly situated defendants, such disparate outcomes are not permissible under the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause.In support of their argument, they cited Gupta v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:05 pm by emagraken
  The Defendant denied liability but was found 100% liable at trial. [read post]